Let the dimensions be x, y and z.
xyz = 60
As the numbers are consecutive then we can say that y = x + 1 and z = x + 2, therefore:
x (x + 1) (x + 2) = xyz = 60
Expanding the brackets gives x3 + 3x2 + 2x = 60
Thus x3 + 3x2 + 2x - 60 = 0
We now need to factor this to find the roots.
This factors to:
(x-3) (x2 + 6x + 20) = 0
The second bracket above has two imaginary roots. Therefore the only real root is x-3 = 0. Therefore x = 3.
The dimensions are thus 3, 4 and 5.
There are, of course, infinitely many solutions here. Choose any two positive numbers for the first two dimensions. Then divide 336 by the product of the two numbers, to get the third dimension.
No.
It is not possible in our Universe that two consecutive numbers can total an even number, since any two consecutive numbers must be an odd and an even (or vice versa). There are two consecutive odd numbers which total 132 ie 65 and 67
They are called just that: "consecutive numbers".They are called just that: "consecutive numbers".They are called just that: "consecutive numbers".They are called just that: "consecutive numbers".
No.
There are, of course, infinitely many solutions here. Choose any two positive numbers for the first two dimensions. Then divide 336 by the product of the two numbers, to get the third dimension.
No
1ftx12ft=12 feet
No.
Not possible in consecutive integers, nearest is consecutive even integers: 148 & 152
Defining "consecutive" as "following continuously in unbroken or logical sequence," it is possible to have many different types of consecutive things: consecutive days, months, odd numbers, even numbers, etc. The list you have is consecutive, they are consecutive multiples of ten.
It is not possible in our Universe that two consecutive numbers can total an even number, since any two consecutive numbers must be an odd and an even (or vice versa). There are two consecutive odd numbers which total 132 ie 65 and 67
In whole numbers of feet 3000 long by 1 wide. I suspect that more accurate wording might help answerers.
They are called just that: "consecutive numbers".They are called just that: "consecutive numbers".They are called just that: "consecutive numbers".They are called just that: "consecutive numbers".
That isn't possible.
No.
No.