0
What is the problem with using particle model of heat transfer?
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Using the particle model explain what happens to water as it is gradually heated and changes from ice to steam?
the ice melts and condenses into steam
How do ear defenders work using a model of energy transfer?
Ear defenders do not transfer the sound waves, instead they absorb them, so as little sound as possible is transferred to the ears
Is gravity a fundamental force or a curvature of space-time?
There are basically two schools of thought about gravity, one I shall call the curvature or Einstein model, and the other one I shall call the particle model. The Einstein model asserts that gravity is a curvature of spacetime and is the one predominately thought in schools, mainly because the particle model is more difficult to explain. The particle model on the other hand asserts that, just like the other forces of nature, the force of gravity is transmitted via a virtual spin-2 particle called the graviton. The particle model also says that the graviton affects, or couples to, each other particle including other gravitons. The predictions these models make are the same, because gravitons couple to everything, and to themselves, they can certainly give the same appearance as a theory of bent spacetime because there is no way to distinguish it (because there is nothing that does not couple to the graviton, and thus gravity) from a model with a rigid spacetime but with graviton self-interaction. In fact using the framework of quantum field theory, one can show that one arises at exactly the same equations using the particle model as when using the curvature model. The curvature model is older, being the model Einstein used himself, but the particle model seems to put gravity on equal footing as the other three fundamental forces (electromagnetism, weak and strong forces) which is also very pleasing. The particle model, however, has not yet been successfully been merged with the other three forces due to internal inconsistencies. We have not yet seen a graviton in a particle collider because gravity is extremely weak compared to the other forces (consider a simple magnet able to lift up a piece of iron even with the entire gravity of the Earth pulling on it!) so a graviton would only couple very weakly so it would be very hard to detect. In fact I can probably not overstate how hard it would be. A graviton couples so weakly that its influence would only become important in particle interactions at very high energies, and it is likely that at that point new physics will also emerge, such as the possible discreteness of space and time for example.
Can you give me an example of declarative sentence using the word 'particle'?
The explanation was disappointing, not a particle of supporting evidence
What is the advantage of using the particle theory of matter?
For many applications, the Particle Theory is an adequate working model. It is known to no longer be apply in many circumstances. So pragmatism wins the day.Similarly, 25/8 is an adequate approximation of Pi for most 'back of the envelope' calculations, even though it is known to be inexact.
How temperature and pressure are related using the particle model?
Because
How many constraints should be taken in optimal placement of capacitor problem for voltage improvement using Particle swarm optimization?
Four constraints should be taken in optimal placement of capacitor problem for voltage improvement using the Particle Swarm Optimization.
How does the mass of the magnesium changes using the particle model?
i will burning quickly and joined together to make a compound.
Using the particle model explain what happens to water as it is gradually heated and changes from ice to steam?
the ice melts and condenses into steam
Could you give me a sentence using the word particle in it?
Particle Man, Particle Man, doing the things a particle can.
How do ear defenders work using a model of energy transfer?
Ear defenders do not transfer the sound waves, instead they absorb them, so as little sound as possible is transferred to the ears
Nikon Coolpix digital camera and the nikon transfer software when you plug your camera in no devices are ever found Has anyone else had this problem or know what you could do?
yes, i have the same problem. I still cant fix it but, i am using my desktop for the transfer. If i found solution i will not hasitate to inform you.
Is gravity a fundamental force or a curvature of space-time?
There are basically two schools of thought about gravity, one I shall call the curvature or Einstein model, and the other one I shall call the particle model. The Einstein model asserts that gravity is a curvature of spacetime and is the one predominately thought in schools, mainly because the particle model is more difficult to explain. The particle model on the other hand asserts that, just like the other forces of nature, the force of gravity is transmitted via a virtual spin-2 particle called the graviton. The particle model also says that the graviton affects, or couples to, each other particle including other gravitons. The predictions these models make are the same, because gravitons couple to everything, and to themselves, they can certainly give the same appearance as a theory of bent spacetime because there is no way to distinguish it (because there is nothing that does not couple to the graviton, and thus gravity) from a model with a rigid spacetime but with graviton self-interaction. In fact using the framework of quantum field theory, one can show that one arises at exactly the same equations using the particle model as when using the curvature model. The curvature model is older, being the model Einstein used himself, but the particle model seems to put gravity on equal footing as the other three fundamental forces (electromagnetism, weak and strong forces) which is also very pleasing. The particle model, however, has not yet been successfully been merged with the other three forces due to internal inconsistencies. We have not yet seen a graviton in a particle collider because gravity is extremely weak compared to the other forces (consider a simple magnet able to lift up a piece of iron even with the entire gravity of the Earth pulling on it!) so a graviton would only couple very weakly so it would be very hard to detect. In fact I can probably not overstate how hard it would be. A graviton couples so weakly that its influence would only become important in particle interactions at very high energies, and it is likely that at that point new physics will also emerge, such as the possible discreteness of space and time for example.
Is gravity a force or a curvature of space time?
There are basically two schools of thought about gravity, one I shall call the curvature or Einstein model, and the other one I shall call the particle model. The Einstein model asserts that gravity is a curvature of spacetime and is the one predominately thought in schools, mainly because the particle model is more difficult to explain. The particle model on the other hand asserts that, just like the other forces of nature, the force of gravity is transmitted via a virtual spin-2 particle called the graviton. The particle model also says that the graviton affects, or couples to, each other particle including other gravitons. The predictions these models make are the same, because gravitons couple to everything, and to themselves, they can certainly give the same appearance as a theory of bent spacetime because there is no way to distinguish it (because there is nothing that does not couple to the graviton, and thus gravity) from a model with a rigid spacetime but with graviton self-interaction. In fact using the framework of quantum field theory, one can show that one arises at exactly the same equations using the particle model as when using the curvature model. The curvature model is older, being the model Einstein used himself, but the particle model seems to put gravity on equal footing as the other three fundamental forces (electromagnetism, weak and strong forces) which is also very pleasing. The particle model, however, has not yet been successfully been merged with the other three forces due to internal inconsistencies. We have not yet seen a graviton in a particle collider because gravity is extremely weak compared to the other forces (consider a simple magnet able to lift up a piece of iron even with the entire gravity of the Earth pulling on it!) so a graviton would only couple very weakly so it would be very hard to detect. In fact I can probably not overstate how hard it would be. A graviton couples so weakly that its influence would only become important in particle interactions at very high energies, and it is likely that at that point new physics will also emerge, such as the possible discreteness of space and time for example.
Why evaporation and distillation can separate a solute from a solution using the particle model of matter?
Because of the friction that makes it separate!!hope that helped
Can you give me an example of declarative sentence using the word 'particle'?
The explanation was disappointing, not a particle of supporting evidence
What is resin transfer molding?
It would be the material used to make a model from a mold using resin. See more at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transfer_molding
