Newton's first law predicts how objects at rest and in motion will behave. Newton's second law builds on his first law, but does not negate it. Refer to the related link below for more information.
The Second Law is Force = Mass times Acceleration. The First Law can be derived from the Second Law by setting the Focre to zero or the Acceleration to zero;. No force = no acceleration; or No acceleration = no force.
Actually, the first one is completely independent on the second one. But the second one doesn't make any sense without the first one.
Its a matter of being scientifically rigorous. You can not claim the 2nd law as a law unless you first establish the first law.
Newton's first and third laws of motion don't contribute anything to an understandingof Kepler's laws of planetary motion.Kepler's laws can be derived from Newton's law of universal gravitation, along with hissecond law of motion.
The first law can be derived from the second law but I don't think the second law can be derived from the third law. Newton's second law states that the rate of change of momentum is proportional to the resultant force and acts in the same direction as the resultant force. For a constant mass, F = ma This means that if F (the resultant force) is zero, a (acceleration) is zero. Thus, if the resultant force on a body is zero, a body continues in its state of rest or uniform motion in a straight line. This is Newton's first law.
This is because two concepts are derived from the newtons second law. First : Force . F = m * a Second : momentum .. p = m * v
The Second Law is Force = Mass times Acceleration. The First Law can be derived from the Second Law by setting the Focre to zero or the Acceleration to zero;. No force = no acceleration; or No acceleration = no force.
Actually, the first one is completely independent on the second one. But the second one doesn't make any sense without the first one.
Its a matter of being scientifically rigorous. You can not claim the 2nd law as a law unless you first establish the first law.
His First Law and Second Law both do.
Newton's first law is to define force Second law to measure force Third law to know about nature of force What about fourth law? I have not heard about it. May be your expectation with gravitation
Newton's first law is to define force Second law to measure force Third law to know about nature of force What about fourth law? I have not heard about it. May be your expectation with gravitation
Newton's first and third laws of motion don't contribute anything to an understandingof Kepler's laws of planetary motion.Kepler's laws can be derived from Newton's law of universal gravitation, along with hissecond law of motion.
NEWTONS THIRD LAW OF MOTIONWhenever a first body exerts a force F on a second body, the second body exerts a force −F on the first body. F and −F are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction.Example: seatbelts
no
The first law can be derived from the second law but I don't think the second law can be derived from the third law. Newton's second law states that the rate of change of momentum is proportional to the resultant force and acts in the same direction as the resultant force. For a constant mass, F = ma This means that if F (the resultant force) is zero, a (acceleration) is zero. Thus, if the resultant force on a body is zero, a body continues in its state of rest or uniform motion in a straight line. This is Newton's first law.
No, it's the other way around. Newton's third (also first) law can be mathematically derived from his second law.