This isn't possible, as the arbitrary line between the definition of a "battle", "skirmish", and "raid" is fuzzy. That is, what one historian will label a quick battle, another will label a skirmish, and yet another just write off as a minor incursion.
Labels such a battle have no real fixed objective definition (certainly, not one that lasts more than the lifespan of the historian concerned), and thus, categorizing them as "longest", "shortest", "biggest", or "fastest" is impossible, except in the context drawn by a single historian. That is, historian A can rank them according to criteria they set up, but that cannot be compared to historian B's ranking, who will use another set of criteria.
Not to mention the major problem here of determining exactly when a battle started and stopped. Which, particularly in the time before mechanical timepieces, was practically impossible.
battle of the bulge
The battle of Palmetto Ranch.
battle of Gettysburg
yes, with 2 million casualties
yes
The American Relation
Gettysburg
The Battle of Berlin fought was fought is your ANUS
Gettysburg 1-3 July 1863
We need more information. The worse country, person, war, battle.
The Battle was fought in Venezuela
The Monitor and the Merrimack fought the first ever battle between two ironclads.