you cannot have equal amount of solar energy everyday you cannot have equal amount of solar energy everyday Converting to solar energy is expensive because there are necessary materials to buy in order to store the sun's energy. The structure must be specially designed and located in a suitable situation, that is in areas where sunny days are more prevalent than cloudy days. There must not be obstructions that cause shade like trees, buildings, etc. There must be contractors who know how to install the equipment correctly. These specialized contractors are few.
Solar energy is cheaper than regular energy because solar energy comes from the sun and you don't have to pay to use the sun you just have to buy the stuff to use solar energy.
Solar panels produce only very small amounts of usable power. They are also expensive. The bottom line is that they really are not viable in terms of real power as of yet. With a little luck and a few more years of research, they may someday actually produce more power then what they take to make. Currently, they never make as much power as it takes to build one.
It converts sunlight into electricity
Nuclear energy is a very expensive proposition. The costs associated with designing and building a nuclear plant are monumental. Additionally, the operating risks have been exposed at different places and at different times. (Chernobyl is the best worst case example.) Another issue is that nuclear materials can be stolen or otherwise "redirected" to make weapons, or very "dirty" conventional weapons. (In a conventional application, a chemical bomb is used to disperse radioactive materials over a populated area.)
Given these variables, not all countries or powers want to get involved in the nuclear energy business. Though new plants could be built, there aren't many on the drawing board. Costs, difficulties in construction, and hazards associated with operating accidents dissuade most parties that might participate.
Because fossil fuel takes millions of years to be formed, so the carbon is cycled over a very long time period.
Burning wood cycles the carbon over a much shorter period. In other words, burning wood produces CO2 , but at the same time new trees are growing and absorbing CO2 from the atmosphere in a much shorter carbon cycle.
1) I live the in the Pacific Northwest. The sun doesn't shine very often.
2) Even if you live in a place where the sun shines a lot, solar power is a large investment and people are more inclined to spend $3.65/gal on gas than spending a lot out of pocket for solar panels.
It is because our government is greedy of money they will not make the solar energy as major energy...
Solar energy and metamorphic energy these are the two energy's that come from the sun
If u live close to the sun you not gone see it
Mainly because it is so 'dilute' and does not produce sufficient energy for our requirements.
What keeping Solar energy from being wide spread is people not being able to afford it
Lack of reliability. Sun does not shine every day, and does not shine at night.
What is the question?
solar energy and energy from fossil fuels
Wind, water, solar and many others.
There are many other alternatives to using our fossil fuels, get online silly! Google things like wind, solar energy, and water energy....
We can slow the use of fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) by educating people on the reasons for global warming.We can also move to renewable energy (solar, wind, hydro, tidal and wave, geothermal among others).
This question makes no sense
solar energy is only working when the sun is shining.
fossil energy is not same as solar energy. Fossil : Its a non renewable energy.but Solar is renewable Energy,its green and eco friendly
Trees, electricity, water running, wind, solar power, and others. NOT be replaced... fossil fuels, oil, gasoline, and others.
Fossil fuels are an indirect form of solar energy because solar energy was used to sustain the plant life,through photosynthesis, that is now now part of the fossil fuels.
Solar and wind energy don't expel CO2 (carbon dioxide) into the atmosphere. Fossil fuels do. Also wind and solar energy are renewable energies. Fossil fuels will eventually run out.
The hydrocarbons used in the fossil fuel are the product of photosynthesis, that took place in the plants of carboniferous age. Since photosynthesis require solar energy, these fossil fuels have also been derived from solar energy.
fossil fuels
disadvantages of solar energy opposed to fossil fuel?
because solar energy is renewable (never gets used up), solar energy is energy from the sun, it will never run out....fossil fuels such as oil coal and gas are getting used up fast, they are non renewable and so it is a big issue....so using solar energy is good to fossil fuel because then the fossil fuels will not get used up.
Most countries burn fossil fuels to generate electricity.If they used solar power to generate electricity, thenThey would not have to use so much fossil fuel.Solar Energy itself does not reduce the use of fossil fuels. But the use of solar energy should hopefully reduce the need of fossil fuels to create energy, so therefore the more we can use solar power as an energy source instead of fossil fuels, the more we reduce the use of fossil fuels.
Solar energy is a potential alternative for fossil fuels. It is a renewable source of energy and will be available as long as the sun lasts.