Fish can not be amphibians. The big difference is that amphibians breath by gills or spiracles when they are young and develop lungs as they grow and undergo metamorphosis, while fish can only breath via gills.
Amphibians are fish-like in their larval stages(child or baby). They have some form of fins (tail), gills, and usually no limbs yet. aka: a tadpole, which is a free-swimming baby frog.
They will grow limps and exchange their gills for lungs when they become adults.
Mud-puppies are salamanders which keep their gills even when they are adults and so could be said to be more "fish-like".
they both have scales, live in water (amphibians most of the time) and are invertebrates
Neither, they are fish..
No. A fish is an amphibian.
reptile
NO. A piranha is a fish. And don't you mean an amphibian?
reptile
mammal
A sailfish is a fish.
A dolphin is neither reptile, amphibian, or fish. It is a mammal. It comes up to the surface of the water to breathe air through it's blowhole.
Sharks are fish, cartilagenous fish.
A Mudskipper is a FISH not a reptile or amphibian, it belongs to the gobi family witch is the largest family of fish.
A Mudskipper is a FISH not a reptile or amphibian, it belongs to the gobi family witch is the largest family of fish.
Yes, it is a Mammal.
it is a Amphibian... A frog is an amphibian, not a reptile.