Want this question answered?
Scientific explanations are tentative proposals that are subject to evaluation, modification, or even overturn in light of further evidence. An explanation is a statement or account that makes something clear, or a reason or justification given for an action or belief. The basic difference is that a scientific explanation is a proposal that is subject to evaluation, modification, or overturn, and an explanation simply makes something clear or gives a reason or justification.
There is a very strong relationship between emerging scientific ideas and open-mindedness. In order to accept new scientific ideas, one must have an open mind about how the world works.
ReSearch
People tend to say that scientific theories are "just" a theory because of a confusion between the common usage of "theory" and the scientific definition. (In everyday speech people often use the word "theory" in the sense of a "hunch" or "vague idea". This is not what the word means in a scientific context). A scientific theory is deduced from observations and is the simplest way of describing natural phenomena. It is testable, observable, predictable, and falsifiable. Scientific theories are not the same thing as hypotheses, which are explanations that haven't been demonstrated or verified. A scientific theory has evidence to back it up. The common usage of 'theory' suggests an explanation that someone hasn't proven, or isn't able to prove. It doesn't imply evidence that has been tested; it doesn't imply predictability. When someone hears, for example, "Big Bang theory" or "the theory of evolution", they may hear the word 'theory' and associate those scientific theories with someone's opinion or suggestion. In reality, these theories are the best scientific explanations for a myriad of phenomena across multiple scientific definitions. In science, "just a theory" is a very good place to be.
Scientific theory is a well supported by evidence set of principles that explain and predict natural phenomenon. A scientific law explains what some phenomenon does scientifically and under the same conditions.
the relationship between a scientific investigation and a scientific knowledge is that they lead to constantly changing.
relationship between scientific and philosophical method of investigation
A scientific question asks for evidence, a nonscientific evidence asks for opinion.
Scientific explanations are tentative proposals that are subject to evaluation, modification, or even overturn in light of further evidence. An explanation is a statement or account that makes something clear, or a reason or justification given for an action or belief. The basic difference is that a scientific explanation is a proposal that is subject to evaluation, modification, or overturn, and an explanation simply makes something clear or gives a reason or justification.
scientific theories are build on different hypothesizes
scientific theories are build on different hypothesizes
The Scientific Revolution was a conflict between authority and evidence. Authority came in the form of the Church, which did not want to accept new scientific ideas. Evidence came in the form of experiments and observations that scientists were coming up with that were proven true repeatedly.
Probably none.
There is a very strong relationship between emerging scientific ideas and open-mindedness. In order to accept new scientific ideas, one must have an open mind about how the world works.
There is a very strong relationship between emerging scientific ideas and open-mindedness. In order to accept new scientific ideas, one must have an open mind about how the world works.
Scientific Evidence.
Groups of scientific statements about the cell and the relationship between organisms and cells is call an hypothesis. An hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon which is testable.