"Relative gravity" is used more or less as a synonym for density; it bears no direct relation with "gravity" as such. So, you would have to specify, "specific gravity [or density] of what substance".
"Relative gravity" is used more or less as a synonym for density; it bears no direct relation with "gravity" as such. So, you would have to specify, "specific gravity [or density] of what substance".
"Relative gravity" is used more or less as a synonym for density; it bears no direct relation with "gravity" as such. So, you would have to specify, "specific gravity [or density] of what substance".
"Relative gravity" is used more or less as a synonym for density; it bears no direct relation with "gravity" as such. So, you would have to specify, "specific gravity [or density] of what substance".
"Relative gravity" is used more or less as a synonym for density; it bears no direct relation with "gravity" as such. So, you would have to specify, "specific gravity [or density] of what substance".
That's going to depend on 'relative' to what ?Relative to the acceleration of gravity on Earth, it's precisely 1.000, or 100% .Relative to the acceleration of gravity on Pluto, it's 16.822, or 1,682.2 % .
The percentage relative to what?
9.8m/s2
If you weigh 100lbs on Earth, you would weigh 37.8lbs on Mercury.
Pluto's mass is estimated at only 1/155th of Earth's. The gravity there would be 1/15th Earth gravity.
9.81 m/s squared
Generally gravity of other planets, moons, ext is compared relatively to Earth's (with Earth's being 1).
Mars has 38% the pull of gravity than th Earth's.
The acceleration of gravity ... and therefor the weight of any object ... on thesurface of Mercury is 37.698% of its value on the surface of Earth. (rounded)
Space has no gravity. Gravity needs a mass to exist, and it is relative to other neighbouring masses.
Nothing, it is meaningless.
Advantage of a gravity dam is that every section will be stable and reliable. An Earth dam can overflow and collapse because of erosion.