it is morally wrong
That depends on who you ask. One person or religion may consider it wrong, another may not.
Opinions on test tube babies vary among religious groups. Some religions may view it as morally permissible, as long as it does not involve the destruction of embryos or violate other ethical principles. Others may have concerns about the manipulation of human life and the sanctity of traditional reproductive methods. It is important to consult specific religious teachings and leaders for a more nuanced understanding.
Test tube babies are concieved in test tubes. Naturally concieved babies are concieved during sexual intercourse
Those who disapprove of test tube babies would probably say that God intended for conception to occur in a uterus, not in a test tube.
No test tube babies can be just as healthy as a normal born baby.
The history of the test tube babies is that the first successful test tube baby was in 1978. This happened in Great Britain.
They are the same things
With "test tube babies" the only difference is that the eggs are fertilized in a lab, then implanted in the mother, or a surrogate. The same problems that can prevent normal delivery in a regular pregnancy can also prevent normal delivery in the case of test tube babies.
50
very bad
they kill u
Test Tube Babies - 1948 is rated/received certificates of: Finland:(Banned) (1950) Finland:(Banned) (1948) Sweden:15
The babies, once born, are all the same.
In vitro fertilization