It is: (CC) which means 1000*200 = 200,000
The Roman numeral for two hundred and fifty is CCL.
there is no roman numeral for itAnother answer: The Romans had no numeral to represent zero because there was no need for a zero in their system. We have 9 numbers plus the zero symbol. We add a zero on to the end of a number to convert it to tens and two zeros to convert it to hundreds and so on. The Romans simply had different symbols for tens and hundreds. For example we would write 1, 10, 20, 40, 50, 100 and 200 but the same numbers as Roman numerals would be I, X, XX, XL, L, C and CC, done quite simply with no need for a zero. In the middle ages monks, who still used Roman numerals and wrote in Latin, began to used the symbol N to represent zero (from the Latin Nullae meaning nothing).
It would be a "D" with two vinculums or bars on top.
classical and original
22 = XXII
Roman Numeral for the number 2 is II.
Yes under today's rules governing the Roman numeral system XCIX is 99 But during the Roman era the equivalent of 99 was probably IC (100-1 = 99)
2 = II
MCCII
The number 10 has a roman numeral of X. The number 50 has a roman numeral of L. These are the only 2 digit numbers with a single value.
CCD is not a Roman numeral. C is a Roman numeral which has a value of 100. D is also a Roman numeral which has a value of 500. However according to the rules of writing Roman numerals although a C can preceed a D, to represent 400, no number should be preceed by two or more numbers of lesser value. If CCD was a Roman numeral it would have a value of 300 but the correct Roman numeral for 300 is CCC.
Two thousand = 2,000