They are elected officials.
Missouri
it goes to the courts than the congress to see if they approve or not.
The methods of judicial selection for federal appellate judges state appellate and state trial judges
In the United States, judges can be chosen through various methods depending on the jurisdiction. At the federal level, judges are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. In many states, judges are elected through popular votes, while others appoint judges through a selection process involving a nominating commission or the governor. These methods can vary widely, reflecting local preferences and practices regarding judicial selection.
The judge selection process varies by jurisdiction but typically involves either appointment or election. In some areas, judges are appointed by the governor or a judicial nominating commission, while in others, they are elected by the public. Qualifications often include legal experience, education, and sometimes a review process that assesses candidates' suitability. After selection, judges usually serve for a fixed term or until a mandatory retirement age, depending on local laws.
Federal judges are appointed by the President of the United States and confirmed by the Senate. The process involves the President nominating a candidate, the Senate Judiciary Committee holding hearings to evaluate the nominee, and the full Senate voting on whether to confirm the nominee. This process ensures that federal judges are selected based on their qualifications and suitability for the position.
The way by which judges are chosen.
Another name for the merit selection of judges is the "Missouri Plan" or the "Judicial Merit Selection System." It is a method used to appoint judges based on their qualifications and experience rather than through political appointments or elections.
the blue slip policy-the process by which a senator can block the nominationof a federal official such as a judge!
The appointment of judges by state legislatures is considered more political because it often involves greater influence from multiple political actors, party dynamics, and interest groups, leading to potential partisan considerations in the selection process. Legislators may prioritize political alliances or constituency preferences over judicial qualifications, resulting in a selection process that is more susceptible to political maneuvering. In contrast, governors typically have a more centralized authority in appointing judges, which can allow for a more streamlined and less politically influenced selection, although that is not always the case. This difference in the appointment process can affect the perceived independence and impartiality of the judiciary.
being confirmed by the senate. hope that helps.
Bancroft C. Henderson has written: 'The selection of judges in Texas' -- subject(s): Judges