150
no i hate when people just say no
I hate how this question comes up on google with no answer
much larger.slightly larger.in space. Correct answer is MUCH LARGER. ;-)
For telescopes of the same size: if the wavelength gets longer, the maximum theoretical angular resolution gets larger (i.e., worse).
Use of interferometers :)
The angular size of the smallest features that the telescope can see ;-)
the lens and eye piece
Optical
no i hate when people just say no
I hate how this question comes up on google with no answer
It allows two or more smaller telescopes to achieve angular resolution of a much larger telescope.
much larger.slightly larger.in space. Correct answer is MUCH LARGER. ;-)
a light-collecting area equivalent to that of a much larger telescope.an angular resolution equivalent to that of a much larger telescope.both the light-collecting area and angular resolution of a much larger telescope.Correct answer: an anguar resolution equivalent to that of a much larger telescope. ;-)
For telescopes of the same size: if the wavelength gets longer, the maximum theoretical angular resolution gets larger (i.e., worse).
Stars are very far away. Eyes just haven't got enough angular resolution. You can help it artificially with technology. Larger the thing, better the angular resolution.
Use of interferometers :)
Specifically if you increase the diameter of the main lens, or of the main mirror (depending on the type of the telescope), you'll be able to observe dimmer objects (stars, planets, etc.). Also, the telescope's resolving power (angular resolution) improves with a bigger mirror/lens. For example, with a bigger mirror/lens you'll be able to distinguish two stars that are closer together as separate objects.