0
What else can I help you with?
What has the author R T Allen written?
R. T. Allen has written: 'The necessity of God' -- subject(s): God, Ontological Proof, Proof, Ontological
What has the author Josef Seifert written?
Josef Seifert has written: 'Ritornare a Platone' -- subject(s): Criticism and interpretation 'The philosophical diseases of medicine and their cure' -- subject(s): Ethics, Medical, Life, Medical Philosophy, Medical ethics, Medicine, Philosophy, Philosophy, Medical 'Gott als Gottesbeweis' -- subject(s): God, Ontological Proof, Phenomenology, Proof, Ontological
What has the author Reinhard Margreiter written?
Reinhard Margreiter has written: 'Ontologie und Gottesbegriffe bei Nietzsche' -- subject(s): Death of God theology, God, Ontological Proof, Ontology, Proof, Ontological 'Vor deinen Augen'
What has the author Georges Dicker written?
Georges Dicker has written: 'Perceptual knowledge' -- subject- s -: Knowledge, Theory of, Perception - Philosophy -, Theory of Knowledge 'Descartes' -- subject- s -: First philosophy, God, Knowledge, Theory of, Methodology, Ontological Proof, Proof, Ontological, Theory of Knowledge 'Berkeley's idealism' -- subject- s -: Idealism, Idea - Philosophy -, Metaphysics
What has the author Garth Meyers written?
Garth Meyers has written: 'Form and nature of the ultimate power' -- subject(s): God, Ontological Proof, Power (Philosophy)
Is Saint Anselm's ontological argument sufficient enough to present a theistic proof?
Saint Anselm's ontological argument is a philosophical reasoning that asserts the existence of God based on the concept of a perfect being. While it is compelling for some, its sufficiency as a theistic proof is debated. Critics argue that it relies heavily on a specific definition of God and may not resonate with those who do not accept its premises. Ultimately, while it provides an interesting perspective, it may not be universally convincing as definitive proof of God's existence.
What is standard not case?
the standard is proof beyond a reasonable doubt
What is the difference between burden of proof and standard of proof?
Burden of proof is who has to prove the case by meeting or exceeding the standard of proof. In a criminal case, it's the prosecution. In a civil case, it's the plaintiff. Standard of proof is the unquantifiable amount of proof that must be shown. In criminal cases, it's beyond a reasonable doubt. In civil cases, it's a preponderance of the evidence.
What has the author Richard James Campbell written?
Richard James Campbell has written: 'From belief to understanding' -- subject(s): God, History of doctrines, Ontological Proof 'The concept of truth' -- subject(s): Truth
What are some recommended books on ontological arguments?
There are many options for books on ontological arguments at Amazon, including The Many-Faced Argument: Recent Studies on the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God. Barnes and Noble and Borders also offer a selection.
What is Descartes' proof of God and can you provide a summary of it?
Descartes' proof of God is based on the idea that since he has a clear and distinct idea of God as a perfect being, and since existence is a necessary attribute of perfection, God must exist. In other words, Descartes argues that the very concept of a perfect being necessitates its existence. This proof is known as the ontological argument.
What is the difference between the standard of proof and the burden of proof in legal proceedings?
The standard of proof refers to the level of certainty required to prove a claim in court, such as "beyond a reasonable doubt" in criminal cases or "preponderance of the evidence" in civil cases. The burden of proof, on the other hand, is the responsibility of the party making the claim to provide evidence and convince the court of its validity. In essence, the standard of proof sets the bar for how convincing the evidence must be, while the burden of proof determines who has the obligation to meet that standard.
