This sounds like an arrangement similar to Best Western where each member hotel is individually owned and operated but gains from being part of an umbrella organisation with shared identity, advertising and branding along with savings from economies of scale. Care needs to be taken to establish and maintain very high standards of operation with the ultimate sanction being the removal of membership and rights to the use of the brand to hotels not maintaining those standards.
One disadvantage to owning a private company is the fact that financing the business may be difficult. An advantage to owning a private company is the fact that you are in control of your business decisions.
owning the shares of stocks from other companies
you would pay your employees and the bills then you would get all the left over
The public company enterprises work with the main motive of providing service to public. A public company is a company who offers stock to the general public. Anyone can buy a share or multiple shares of stock at that point owning part of that company.
Only if you also lay brick or stone, bricklayers wages are too high , and builders pay too little to make a profit
A mother company is any company which owns a smaller or "subsidiary" company. The mother company may be simply a company that owns companies without actually producing a product in and of itself (such as General Motors owning Pontiac) or the company may produce a general product while leaving specialization to a subsidiary (Such as Disney owning Walt Disney Pictures) or the mother company may simply have merged with a totally unrelated company (such as Pepsi owning Taco Bell).
If you wish to establish an owning relationship with an individual's person category and they are already owned by another organization, are you able to establish an additional owning relationship?
If you wish to establish an owning relationship with an individual's person category and they are already owned by another organization, are you able to establish an additional owning relationship?
A subsidiary is an 'off-shoot' or 'child' of an existing company, either partly or fully owned by the 'mother' company doing mostly similar or complementary businesses, e.g., a travel services subsidiary of a big bank (the bank's executives travel so much it makes sense to have a self-owned company serve its needs). A holding company holds the shares of stock, or shares of ownership of other companies, usually but not always controlling shares (enough shares to exert control of the companies). If you own shares of stocks in a holding company, you are essentially owning a part of many different companies and are trusting the holding company's management to handle the proportions for you. A subsidiary is the down result of a business idea. A holding company is the up result of a business idea.
No one receives money for owning stock which is permanent investment in the company and can only hope to receive dividends as ones share of profit or sell the equity in the stock market to receive a premium if the share value is high.However owning high percentage of stock gives an individual the option to be elected with each equity counted as a vote in the board of directors who are paid and enjoy benefits of the company.
The owner of Larsen and Toubro (L&T) is mainly made up of institutional shareholders, including mutual funds and insurance companies. There is no single individual owner of the company. However, Naik Family, led by A.M. Naik, holds a significant stake in the company.
True
One disadvantage to owning a private company is the fact that financing the business may be difficult. An advantage to owning a private company is the fact that you are in control of your business decisions.
A person owning shares in a company is a shareholder.
Depends on the company. Also depends on the financial status of that company. You can still have a bankruptcy. You never know.
Owning a large company
true