Want this question answered?
Break it down into a sequence of simpler problems, each of which may be broken down further until the problems are simple enough to be easily resolved. Each simple solution should be implemented as a simple function with just one or two very simple statements. Breaking problems down in this way makes code easier to read, especially when each function's name closely reflects the purpose of the function (rendering code self-documenting). Once you have a working solution, you may find some of the simple functions can also be used to solve other complex problems, thus reducing the need to write duplicate code.
* prediction * extrapolation
The conclusion, plain and simple, is the answer to your question. It should be clear, concise and stick to the point. Resist the temptation to jump to conclusions.If you were to do your experiment again, would you get the same results?Can there be differences? Why?Ask yourself what happened when you tested your hypothesis.What have you learned?
To some extent it depends on what you mean by "solve" and "problem", but the answer is no in any case. 1. If by "solve" you mean solve analytically (i.e., come up with a formula that gives the solution) and by "problem" you mean a problem of something as simple as predicting the orbits of the bodies that make up the solar system, then there is a mathematical proof that no solution exists. 2. If by "problem" you mean the problems important to society like war, famine, global climate change, how to live a satisfying and happy life, and by "solve" you mean that scientists working alone can arrange by themselves for these problems to disappear,, then the answer is no. In some limited cases, like global climate change, scientists can suggest possible solutions, but unless the vast majority of the people help implement the suggested solutions, no solution will be accomplished. And science has almost nothing to say about values, ethics. the best form of government, etc. So, no. Science (and certainly not scientists alone) can not solve all problems.
I believe it's called simple syrup. In Mexico it's called jarabe.
Operationalization
The solution to the problem was not simple. A simple menu was planned for the party. They decided to have a simple wedding instead of a big, elaborate one.
It's an example of a simple problem in addition. The solution is: 604
It's a simple example of an addition problem. The solution is: 720
Why are you so Simple? Who likes simple life??
That means that it took a simple solution to deal with a complex problem.
When you find an answer or a solution, it is called solving a problem. This can be done in a number of ways, and can refer to simple equations, or story problems in reality.
Any difference exist. A simple solution may be a diluted solution.
A solution is something that explains how you would/did it. For example if you wanted to figure out how to find out a multiplication problem such as 86*32. The solution would be that you would multiply 2 and 6 and 8 times 2... whatever. The point is that the solution is how you did it.... how you figured out the problem. As for the answer it would be 2752 for the above math problem. It's jus the simple answer. Overall a solution is how you did it and the answer is i guess the answer... the final number guess whatever. I hope this helped!
It appears to be a simple linear equation in 'x'. But it has no solution. There is no numerical value for 'x' that can make it a true statement.
YEs
The Egg of Columbus