That sounds to me like a type I error, or a false positive.
If the type 1 error has a probability of 01 = 1, then you will always reject the null hypothesis (false positive) - even when the evidence is wholly consistent with the null hypothesis.
Yes, although if the experiment is performed correctly there should be relatively little chance of this occurring. This is referred to as a type II error in statistics - the data supports rejecting the hypothesis even though the hypothesis is correct.
An alpha error is another name in statistics for a type I error, rejecting the null hypothesis when the null hypothesis is true.
A beta error is another term for a type II error, an instance of accepting the null hypothesis when the null hypothesis is false.
Rejecting a true null hypothesis.
There are several things which follow such a discovery. First, the scientist would want to publish the findings so that other scientists could examine the evidence as well, and see if they can also observe a contradiction with a previously accepted law or hypothesis, or whether they will discover some error in the methodology, or will be unable to reproduce the phenomenon. Secondly, if the evidence is found to be reliable, it will be necessary to come up with a new hypothesis or law that is consistent with the new evidence, and which can replace the old hypothesis or law, subject to continued testing and observation.
Failing to reject a false null hypothesis.
Rejecting a true null hypothesis.
False. A very important contributor to human error is the false hypothesis or mistaken assumption.
There are two types of errors associated with hypothesis testing. Type I error occurs when the null hypothesis is rejected when it is true. Type II error occurs when the null hypothesis is not rejected when it is false. H0 is referred to as the null hypothesis and Ha (or H1) is referred to as the alternative hypothesis.
a poorly designed hypothesis
Falling to reject (accepting) a false null hypothesis.