Want this question answered?
An informal fallacy of faulty generalization by reaching an inductive generalization based on insufficient evidence
Theory.
That is a matter of dispute. There is no concrete evidence that it has ever been truly found.
There is no concrete evidence as to the exact year, but at a guess it would have been around AD 33-35.
It means they had found evidence that to them, supported the existence of God.
Thesis statement
Hasty generalization is a logical fallacy of faulty generalization by reaching an inductive generalization based on insufficient evidence.
An informal fallacy of faulty generalization by reaching an inductive generalization based on insufficient evidence
Evidence
Evidence
You have it backwards. Theories are supported by evidence. Evidence is not supported by theories, evidence is simply observed.
A word for information that supports a a generalization and starts with 'ev' is 'evidence'.
No, biased statements are not supported by evidence.
an idea supported by evidence
A scientific theory is supported by evidence. Without evidence, it is only a hypothesis.
Providing evidence to support the generalization
A supported inference when you draw a conclusion about something using evidence. The evidence is the support for what you have inferred.