look at pg 37 in the psychology AS by mike cardwell to help answer this ! :)
The forensic approach to interviewing focuses on obtaining accurate and reliable information for legal purposes, emphasizing structured questioning and evidence-gathering techniques. In contrast, the cognitive approach to interviewing aims to understand memory processes and cognitive mechanisms that influence recall, focusing on enhancing memory retrieval through cognitive strategies and minimizing suggestibility. Both approaches prioritize obtaining accurate information, but they differ in their underlying frameworks and techniques used during the interview process.
Yes, eyewitnesses.
Testimonies of eyewitnesses, physical objects, written and recorded communications, habits, character, medical and other records are all valid evidence. Whether a particular piece of evidence is admissible, however, will depend on the rules of each particular court.
Google Jeffrey Dahmer and click on images.
There were no known eyewitnesses to the eruption of Vesuvius in 79 AD that buried Pompeii. However, the eyewitness accounts of Pliny the Younger, who observed the eruption from a distance, provide valuable insights into the event. Archaeological evidence also helps reconstruct what happened during the eruption.
William H. Baker has written: 'Obtaining evidence' -- subject(s): Evidence (Law), Discovery (Law)
At the scene of the crime: Your fingerprints, your DNA, a hidden camera movie or photos of you, 15 eyewitnesses, a gun found on you later that fired a killing bullet. Get ready to go!
what type of evidence is required to proove sales of cocaine within 1000 feet of worship
In a murder trial, some important questions to ask might include: What evidence links the defendant to the crime scene? Are there any eyewitnesses, and what are their accounts of the events? What is the motive behind the alleged crime, and how does it align with the evidence presented? Additionally, what is the reliability of the forensic evidence, and were proper procedures followed during the investigation?
28 Aborigines were killed out of the 40-50 Aboriginal women, children and elderly men who were rounded up. The remainder were eyewitnesses to the horror. There wwas just one white man who was a witness, but not a perpetrator. An employee of Myall Creek Station, a man named Anderson, was the only white to give evidence against the white men who committed this awful slaughter.
It is when you have any kind of text that has a structure, form, and purpose. For example, when you have an article about an interview with someone, then it can be formatted in question and answer. So the text evidence would be: Form: Question and Answer Structure: Interview Purpose: To inform the reader There are many, many more, but that is just an example.
Factual testimony in a trial is most likely to be provided by eyewitnesses, experts, or individuals with direct knowledge of the events in question. Eyewitnesses recount what they personally observed, while expert witnesses offer specialized knowledge relevant to the case. Additionally, documents and physical evidence can also serve as factual testimony to support the claims made during the trial.