We know that,
g1=G.m/R2
so, g is inversely proportional to R2.
And, if Radius of the earth(R) is doubled, the distance between the object and the centre of the earth will become 2R.
Now, g=G.m/(2R)2
=> g2=G.m/4R 2
=> g2=1/4(G.m/R2)
Since, G.m/R2 =g1
=> g2=1/4 g1
Here, g1=9.8 m/s2
So, g2=9.8/4 m/s2
=2.45 m/s2
This does not make sense. Meters squared is a unit of area, not distance.
This is an invalid conversion: square meters is a measure of area and meters is a measure of length or distance.
(distance) squared, be it inches, feet, meters, etc
Invalid conversion: square meters is a measure of area and linear meters is a measure of length or distance.
Assuming you want the international units: time: second velocity: meters / second distance: meters acceleration: meters / second2
A metre is a unit of distance. A square metre is a unit of area. The two units are therefore incompatible.
There cannot be an area of 15 metres. A metre is a measure of distance, not of area. Areas must be measured in squared units of distance.
compared to 7 meters squared, yes... but not compared to a billion meters squared
315 meters squared = 3,391 in feet squared.
75 meters squared is about 7 feet squared.
From "Fluid Mechanics" by Streeter & Wylie (c) 1979 .3048m = 1 ft so... .3048 squared meters squared = 1 squared ft squared or... .0929 meters squared = 1 ft squared or... 1 ft squared /.0929 meters squared = 10.7639 ft squared/ meters squared so... 30 m2 times 10.7639 ft2/m2 = 322.9173 meters squared Answer: 322.9173 meters squared
1/4 acre = about 1,1011.7 meters squared. (1,011.71411 meters squared)