Struck is the past tense of strike.
Yes. If it was present tense, it would be strike.
The verb strike is irregular as the past tense is struck. If the verb was regular then the past tense form would end in -ed.
The word struck is a verb. It is the past tense of the verb "strike".
The past perfect tense is had struck.
It is either a verb or adjective - it is the past tense and one past participle (along with stricken) of the verb "strike". Examples: The car struck him. (verb) A struck coin, a struck batter, a struck pedestrian (adjective)
No. Struck would be a verb. It is past tense, but it isn't an idea, it is an action that happened.
Past verb tense: We drank.Present verb tense: We are drinking.Future verb tense: We will drink.
No. It is two words, struck out. It is a past tense verb form combining "struck" (which can be a noun) with "out," an adverb.
Stuck: means you cant get out of something, as in "you are stuck in quicksand." ("Stuck" is the past tense of "stick") Struck: means to strike or hit something, as in "he struck the fence with the bat" ("Struck" is the past tense of "strike")
The past tense of the verb 'am' is 'was' or 'were.' The verb 'am' is derived from the verb 'to be.'
It can be either. It is, along with stricken, a past participle of the verb 'to strike.' It can be used differently from stricken as an adjective,
The verb is still "to be", regardless of the tense. It is an irregular verb, and the past tense forms are was for I and he/she/it, and were for we, you, and they.