Want this question answered?
Violates the matching principle
Bad debts is the direct write-off method of uncollectable for accounts receivable.
The_direct_write_off_method_of_accounting_for_uncollectible_accounts_violates_the
Direct write off means, to expensed out those accounts receivables to profit and loss account which becomes bad debts and seem unrecovrable from debtors. Other way to write off bad debts is through "Allowance for uncollectable" method which is indirect method to write off bad debts.
There are two reasons why the direct write-off method is not allowed. First, applying the matching principle implies that the cost of the uncollectible accounts need to be expensed in the period of the sale. Giving credit to customers helps to generate sales (if this were not the case, the firm would simply demand payment at time of delivery). Thus, not creating an allowance violates the matching principle. Second, with the direct write-off method, accounts receivable are at the nominal value, whereas the 'true' value (the amount that is expected to be collectible) is most likely lower. Thus, the direct write-off is likely to overstate the value of accounts receivable.
Violates the matching principle
Bad debts is the direct write-off method of uncollectable for accounts receivable.
The_direct_write_off_method_of_accounting_for_uncollectible_accounts_violates_the
Direct Write-off
Direct write off means, to expensed out those accounts receivables to profit and loss account which becomes bad debts and seem unrecovrable from debtors. Other way to write off bad debts is through "Allowance for uncollectable" method which is indirect method to write off bad debts.
There are two reasons why the direct write-off method is not allowed. First, applying the matching principle implies that the cost of the uncollectible accounts need to be expensed in the period of the sale. Giving credit to customers helps to generate sales (if this were not the case, the firm would simply demand payment at time of delivery). Thus, not creating an allowance violates the matching principle. Second, with the direct write-off method, accounts receivable are at the nominal value, whereas the 'true' value (the amount that is expected to be collectible) is most likely lower. Thus, the direct write-off is likely to overstate the value of accounts receivable.
true
True
Direct write-off does not correspond to the time of the initial debt. It charges bad debts against revenue for the current accounting period (i.e. when the debt is proven to be uncollectible).The allowance method is a set-aside wherein a business can retroactively assign bad debts to the corresponding revenue period, or to the one(s) following it.
t
The direct write-off method. For tax purposes, companies must use the direct write-off method, under which bad debts are recognized only after the company is certain the debt will not be paid. Before determining that an account balance is uncollectible, a company generally makes several attempts to collect the debt from the customer. Recognizing the bad debt requires a journal entry that increases a bad debts expense account and decreases accounts receivable.
Direct calorimetry