Want this question answered?
It is the measuring instrument it is invented by verniers its error is very small
It is a defect in a measuring device (Vernier Callipers & Screw Gauge) & zero error is caused by an incorrect position of the zero point.
The zero error depends on the user, and the wear on the metre rule. Given that smaller rulers have about 2mm of material before the zero mark, wear is unlikely to exceed that without being noticed. The reading error is +/- 1 mm.
error, was happening when you are not really sure enough about it...uncertainty,was the thing that you understand
The zero error in the vernier calipers and micrometer screw gauge when the O mark on the main scale is not in line with the pointer.
How much error is allowed in a digital vernier
If you are doing your job properly, you DO!
The Vernier caliper is an extremely precise measuring instrument Error is almost impossible The error that we must always look out for is the zero error and parralex error.
It is the measuring instrument it is invented by verniers its error is very small
The zero error of a measuring instrument is the measure that it shows when it should actually be showing zero.
According to my understanding it is the pressure that gets applied on the measured body by the instrument itself. For excample: If u are measuring a cube with a vernier caliper then there is a chance that a error may occur due to the pressure applied by the teeth of vernier caliper while tightening it..
The scale doesn't start at zero, so you need to compromise or you get a systematic error.
When involving in scientific experiments, it is very important to make measurement. In each and every measurement we take, say a length, time, angle etc. we have to use a particular instrument. As every instrument has a least count (also known as the minimal reading), there will be an uncertainty left. As an example, consider a measurement using a vernier caliper as at 10.00 cm, there will be an error of 0.01cm. If we do the same measurement by a meter ruler, there'll be an error of 0.1 cm, or 1 mm. Therefore the uncertainty of a particular measurement is dependent on the instrument it has been taken. As a convention we take the 1/2 of the least count for analog instruments and the least count for digital instruments as its uncertainty.
A Vernier allows a precise reading of some value. In the figure to the right, the Vernier moves up and down to measure a position on the Scale. This could be part of a barometer which reads atmospheric pressure. The "pointer" is the line on the vernier labelled "0". Thus the measured position is almost exactly 756 in whatever units the scale is calibrated in. If you look closely you will see that the distance between the divisions on the vernier are not the same as the divisions on the scale. The 0 line on the vernier lines up at 756 on the scale, but the 10 line on the vernier lines up at 765 on the scale. Thus the distance between the divisions on the vernier are 90% of the distance between the divisions on the scale. If we do another reading with the vernier at a different position, the pointer, the line marked 0, may not line up exactly with one of the lines on the scale. Here the "pointer" lines up at approximately 756.5 on the scale. If you look you will see that only one line on the vernier lines up exactly with one of the lines on the scale, the 5 line. This means that our first guess was correct: the reading is 756.5. Here is a final example, with the vernier at yet another position. The pointer points to a value that is obviously greater than 756.5 and also less than 757.0. Looking for divisions on the vernier that match a division on the scale, the 7 line matches fairly closely. So the reading is about 756.7. In fact, the 7 line on the vernier appears to be a little bit above the corresponding line on the scale. The 8 line on the vernier is clearly somewhat below the corresponding line of the scale. So with sharp eyes one might report this reading as 756.73 ± 0.02. This "reading error" of ± 0.02 is probably the correct error of precision to specify for all measurements done with this apparatus. Now we shall use a simulation of a Vernier Caliper. A caliper measures a length, and in the following figure we show a caliper being used to measure the length of an Object. The Object will be placed between the "jaws" of the caliper. The Object is almost exactly 75 mm (2.95 in) long. In the above photograph, you can see that on the top of the caliper are two "prongs" which can be used to measure an interior dimension. There is also a piece of metal sticking out from the right side of the caliper, which is a depth gauge. Calipers commonly use a vernier scale. In the simulation below, you may "grab" the jaw of the caliper with the left button of the mouse and move it to some position. When you click on the Show button the distance between the jaws will be shown. Note that there is a small difference between the simulation and a real caliper: in the simulation the distance between the jaws is always an even multiple of a tenth of a millimeter. It does not allow readings between these values, for which we would have to estimate the value. The Java applet to simulate the vernier caliper was written by Fu-Kwan Hwang, Department of Physics, National Taiwan Normal Univ., and is used by permission. See related link for the applet.
It is a defect in a measuring device (Vernier Callipers & Screw Gauge) & zero error is caused by an incorrect position of the zero point.
A micrometer is more accurate but it is only suitable for very small objects. For example, you could not measure the length of a credit card to any degree of accuracy using a standard micrometer.
The zero error of vernier calliper is defined as :-The zero error is equal to the distance between the zero of the main scale and the zero of the vernier scale.