0
It wraps up the ideas at the end of the essay
What else can I help you with?
What statement is true about compare-and-contrast essays?
Compare-and-contrast essays analyze the similarities and differences between two or more subjects. They typically involve examining specific criteria to determine how the subjects are alike and how they are different. These essays often have a clear structure with an introduction, body paragraphs for comparisons and contrasts, and a conclusion.
What is a true statement about essays?
depends on what it is about.
All essays are light and humorous true or false?
True
Difference between the conclusion of an essay and a conclusion of a report?
Essays and reports are similar, but the implication is that essays are about your own thoughts, and reports involve a greater element of research. Conclusions might be more solidly based in a report than in an essay.
If a premise and the conclusion are true the argument is true?
Not necessarily. An argument is not automatically true just because the premise and conclusion are true. The reasoning connecting the premise to the conclusion must also be valid for the argument to be considered true.
What is deductive validity?
A deductively valid argument is if the premises are true then the conclusion is certainly true, not possibly true. The definition does not say that the conclusion is true.
A valid argument can have a false conclusion True or False?
True. - Valid arguments are deductive. - Arguments are valid if the premises lead to the conclusion without committing a fallacy. - If an argument is valid, that means that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true. - This means that a valid argument with a false premise can lead to a false conclusion. This is called a valid, unsound argument. - A valid, sound argument would be when, if the premises are true the conclusion must be true and the premises are true.
What is deductively valid argument?
A deductively valid argument is if the premises are true then the conclusion is certainly true, not possibly true. The definition does not say that the conclusion is true.
Is it true that if you are unable to write essays you cannot be an engineer?
It is not true; some engineers can be intellectuals.
What kind of reasoning proceeds from premises that are known to be true and is then used to arrive at a conclusion that is also known to be true?
Deductive reasoning proceeds from known true premises to a logically necessary true conclusion. This type of reasoning guarantees the truth of the conclusion if the premises are true.
Can an argument with a true premises and true conclusion be invalid?
Yes. It could be a coincidence that the premises and conclusion are all true. For example, here is an argument: 1. It is true that if a person belongs to the Republican Party they must be an American. 2. Mitt Romney is an American. 3. Therefore, the conclusion is that Mitt Romney is a Republican. Although both premises and the conclusion are true, the argument is not valid. That is because it is possible to imagine an argument in this form where the premises were true, but the conclusion is not. (Imagine if the second premise were "Barack Obama is an American" which is true, leading to the conclusion "Barack Obama is a Republican" which is false.)
When is a conclusion valid?
A conclusion is valid when it logically follows from the premises or evidence provided. It means that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. Validity in reasoning ensures that the conclusion is sound and reasonable based on the information presented.
