Nothing.
Circumcision is nothing more then genital mutilation that is carried out mainly for religious and cultural reasons. There is a percentage of people being circumcised ostensibly for reasons of health this is the result of a fad started during Victorian times in English speaking country's. There is however no reason to remove the prepuce from the penis and it is in fact harmful to do so especially in the case of newly born boys. both physically and emotionally.
Yes, if the first circumcision went wrong.
It all depends on what is wrong to require such a drastic bit of work to be done. I mean what medical problem can a patient have that would require a circumcision?
There are so many things that can go wrong with this form of sexual mutilation that all I can do is refer you to a piece written on the subject, please go to the related link below(Complications of circumcision)
No. it is unlikely that they would cover it unles there was something wrong with it. circumcision is an unecesary procedure that has no benefits to health. on the contrary it is bad for health and many people have to deal with the harmfull effects latter in life.
No, the penis is not shortened by circumcision.
Circumcision has nothing to do with infertility.
The religion that does not practice circumcision is Jainism.
A circumcision revision is when a change is made to an already circumcised foreskin. Often this means that either not enough skin was removed, so more skin is removed, or that the initial cut healed unevenly or was badly done to begin.
No, it is nothing to do with it. Circumcision is the removal of the foreskin from the penis.
The circumcision scar is permanent and it can not be gotten rid of.
Surgery can extend, but the surgical procedure that does it is not called circumcision.
When you develop SERIOUS conditions where circumcision is the Only option.