If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community. * Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.
A hypothesis doesn't necessarily need to be correct. After a scientist has conducted an experiment and discovered that their hypothesis is incorrect, they still have gained the knowledge and the results from their experiment---as well as the correct answer, in some cases. They can use the results from the experiment that tested the original hypothesis to form a new experiment.
Jill has great intuition about whether a marriage will succeed. She knew by intuition that he was telling her the truth. His intuition told him that something was likely to go wrong in the experiment.
Aristotle's dynamic motion theory was proven wrong by a man named Galileo. He tested Aristotle's theory by dropping a heavy object and a lighter object at the same time. The experiment proved Aristotle wrong because the result was that the two objects were falling at the same rate (speed).
It is necessary because without the safety rules, an experiment could go wrong and cause damage or seriously injure someone.
the conclusion of the experiment will be wrong so the experiment will be wrong
If you did the experiment wrong
What did SpongeBob do wrong in this experiment? Explain
everything
if something goes wrong they wont get the experiment right so it wont be a controlled experiment
if a single thing its wrong in the experiment everything its wrong so you have to do it all over againg and if you do something wrong and u share your answer with the world u confuse the world
An experiment can prove they are wrong or right ...:)
Any experiment could go wrong if done incorrectly.
proven wrong!!!!
controlled experiment and observations..i might be wrong
To test a hypothesis I think. I hope I'm not wrong
because your hypothesis could be right or wrong