The zero symbol as a Roman numeral is N but it was never needed
53 = LIII in Roman numerals
If you mean 473 as a Roman numeral then it is CDLXXIII or CCCCLXXIII
Zero does not exist in roman numerals
Roman numerals do not include a symbol for zero, so zero cannot be rendered in Roman numberals.
There is no symbol in Roman numerals to represent zero.
The equivalent of 2725 as a Roman numeral is MMDCCXXV
53 = LIII in Roman numerals
If you mean 473 as a Roman numeral then it is CDLXXIII or CCCCLXXIII
Zero does not exist in roman numerals
Roman numerals do not include a symbol for zero, so zero cannot be rendered in Roman numberals.
There is no symbol in Roman numerals to represent zero.
It can't be represented by any symbol.Another Answer:-The symbol for zero as a Roman numeral is N but it is never needed because the positional place value of Roman numerals are self evident.
No Roman numeral exists for zero.
There is no Roman numeral zero.
there is no zero in roman numerals
Because zero is not needed in Roman numerals as the positional place value of these numerals are self evident.
zero