The zero symbol as a Roman numeral is N but it was never needed
If you mean 473 as a Roman numeral then it is CDLXXIII or CCCCLXXIII
53 = LIII in Roman numerals
Zero does not exist in roman numerals
Roman numerals do not include a symbol for zero, so zero cannot be rendered in Roman numberals.
Zero cannot be represented in Roman Numerals.
53 = LIII in Roman numerals
The equivalent of 2725 as a Roman numeral is MMDCCXXV
If you mean 473 as a Roman numeral then it is CDLXXIII or CCCCLXXIII
Zero does not exist in roman numerals
Roman numerals do not include a symbol for zero, so zero cannot be rendered in Roman numberals.
Zero cannot be represented in Roman Numerals.
It can't be represented by any symbol.Another Answer:-The symbol for zero as a Roman numeral is N but it is never needed because the positional place value of Roman numerals are self evident.
No Roman numeral exists for zero.
there is no zero in roman numerals
There is no Roman numeral zero.
Because zero is not needed in Roman numerals as the positional place value of these numerals are self evident.
The number zero does not have a significance in Roman numerals because the Romans did not have a symbol for zero. Roman numerals are based on a system of adding and subtracting values of different symbols to represent numbers.