Youc could be a nanny or work for a day care.
It would be a teaching passed down from the parents to their children.
The approach in the UK with young children is quite different that in the United States. It has influenced current provisions by teaching parents to work and learn with their children. Children learn to play in different environments and learn safe ways to play.
The children work at the city dump to supplement their parents' meager earnings.
no
Children had to work with parents to help their families survive.
Affirmative; Teachers can concentrate on one aspect of a problem, at a time. The teaching problem has been faced before by other teachers. There are planning and presentation tools provided for them to work from. Students are usually inclined to pay attention in class. Students who do not pay attention can be ignored. Teachers often specialize in one subject. Negative; Parents usually understand their children much better. Parents are vitally interested in their childrens' futures. A parent has to smooth over the gaps left by inadequate teaching. Multitasking is the broad task of the parent and is passed on. Parents are concerned with the social welfare of their children. Astute parents know when to leave a child alone to work it out for themselves. Prudent parents must decide whether to impose religion on their children or not.* * This last is not usually advisable in a religious school. :)
Yes because social work is working with people socially and teaching is social because you have to connect with the younger generation (AKA. Children).
yes
Parents were legally required to take their children to work with them
Yes. Parents should be mindful of what's happening to their children even with school works. They have to work hand in hand with the children's teachers so as to give proper guidance to their children. The most successful children are always those who have parents that give their time to them.
== ==
Dangerous work and disease