It depends to what country you are referring to.
people who are rich in money and poor in happiness
Like those movies about native Americans thats how they lived
One argument against globalization is that their is more disparity of wealth now. Other arguments against globalization are that the economics of other countries can affect America and countries can lose jobs when other countries will do the work for less.
An oligarchy
they lost their jobs because of the economic problems and more import.
They Danced.
the rich people in ancient Egypt had jobs as farmers and priests
Not necessarily. A lot of people that provide jobs are not very rich. A lot of jobs do not depend on there being rich people. Some rich people do help in creating jobs through employing people and in the way they spend their money.
farming
Yes they were
being in court or a business person would earn you alot of money and you would be very rich
People who were rich in the 1500s did not have jobs. Some were bankers and loaned money, but most were landowners - and thus nobles - and paid people to work for them.
poor and rich people went to the Globe theatre.
No, not everyone is poor. Economic status varies among individuals and can be influenced by factors such as income, resources, and access to opportunities. Some people may be considered poor, while others may fall into different socioeconomic categories.
The only people to get education were the people with the most money(a.k.a the rich got educated)
watch the servants as they worked and had jobs as knights,Barons and lords.
Yes, the poor people would work for or be slaves for the rich, the poor people were the plebeians and the rich were called the patricians; the equestrians was another of the classes.