m
m
The most important strength portrayed by the jury in Twelve Angry Men was 'determination' regardless of any justifiable (or unjustifiable) logic each individual attached to the term.The group was determined to complete the deliberations as directed by the Judge in the case.
Anyone can lead refers to the idea that leadership is not limited to a specific group of individuals, but is a quality that anyone can possess and demonstrate. It emphasizes that leadership is about actions and behaviors, rather than titles or positions.
You will learn and demonstrate the following; Wilderness studies Business and management principles Group development Leadership theory Communication & Conflict resolution Safe and efficient travel Leave no trace
In "Twelve Angry Men," Juror 3 and Juror 7 can be seen as the least effective communicators. Juror 3 is driven by personal bias and emotional outbursts, which cloud his judgment and hinder constructive dialogue. Meanwhile, Juror 7 is disengaged and more focused on his own interests than the deliberation process, leading to a lack of meaningful contribution. Their inability to engage thoughtfully with the evidence and other jurors stifles productive communication in the group.
Ralph's ability to remain calm and composed under pressure, his focus on the collective well-being of the group, and his willingness to take on responsibility demonstrate his natural leadership qualities in the story.
A dozen?!
A dozen
Large Cities Climate Leadership Group was created in 2005.
This isn't really explored. 12 Angry Men makes for a better title than 12 Angry People. While making remakes, adding female jurors was explored but dismissed as executives did not want to change the title. Writing in a female might change the group dynamic and require extra work in script writing.
A more distant group leadership form is referred to as laissez-faire leadership. This style of leadership keeps managers a distance from employees and lets employees work without much input from the manager.
A collective noun for a small group of angry people is a gang of thugs; a collective noun for a large group of angry people is a mob of people.