0
The big bang theory defies all known laws of science, it is blasphemy to christians saying that god didn't create the universe. But the theory has not broken any laws.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
The Big Bang Theory does not break any specific laws of physics. It is a scientific model that describes the origin and evolution of the universe based on observations and theoretical calculations. However, there are still many questions and mysteries surrounding the Big Bang Theory that scientists are actively working to understand.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
The best evidence that the big bang theory was real?
That Edwin hubble law wikipedia.
Is there a loophole in big bang theory?
It is important to first realize that the big bang theory is a theory; it is not a physical law on its own for which there might be loopholes. However, I think (correct me if I am wrong though), that you are referring to the idea that the big bang theory states that the Universe started with a bang which just came into being out of nothing. This is not entirely correct, the big bang theory does not implicitly say that the Universe came into being at some point; it only says that in the distant past the Universe was very small and that it has been expanding ever since. This statement is well verified by observations and measurements. It does not claim or explain how the Universe came into being. It might sound reasonable that the Universe somehow came into being as a point, and it would fit with the above statements, but the creation of the Universe itself is not yet something that science can say much about. There are models, such as string theory, that sometimes have things to say about this, but they are far from testable at this stage. So, yes, it is possible that something else happened before the Universe became tiny and started to expand, and it wouldn't contradict with the big bang theory at all.
Why aren't the big bang theory and the steady state theory considered scientific laws?
They can't be proven with 100% scientific certainty. No one was there to witness the big bang, so we can't technically say that it definitely happened. And we wouldn't call the Steady State Theory a law, since it has been seriously discounted in recent decades. It is worth adding that when time honored theories become 'laws' it is not because they have be proven with 100% certainty. It is because they have survived the test of time and the test of many, many scientific challenges. Nothing can really be proven with 100% scientific certainty.
How does Newton's third law relate to big bang theory?
hi,my name is uday and I say no gravity was existed before the big bang Therewas nothing, not even time, before the big bang. The very start of the big bang remains unclear, but after a little while when the universe was still small there was certainly an effect from gravity, but likely small compared to the other fundamental forces, which are many orders of magnitude larger (and which don't quite cancel considering the plasma state of matter).
Is the big bang nonsense?
The Big Bang Model has survived every test that has been put up against it, starting with the existence and the spectrum of the cosmic background microwave radiation. To say it is "nonsense" is the intellectual equivalent of saying that Newton's law of gravity is nonsense.
Why is the big bang a theory and not a law?
In science, a theory is the highest denomination that can be given to an idea. In other words, the big bang theory will never graduate into the big bang law. Instead, laws are used as explanations that govern theories. Example: gravity is a theory which is described by Newtonian laws.
In what way does the Big Bang Theory conform with the law of conservation of energy?
The law of Conservation of Energy states that energy can't be created or destroyed, so the Big Bang theory would condradict that.
What is the diffrence between scientific law and scientific theory?
A law is known to be true. There is no dispute about it. A theory is disputable. Gravity is a law, the Big Bang is a theory.
Do astronomers use the terms theory and law?
Certainly; for example, the Big Bang theory, Kepler's Laws.
The best evidence that the big bang theory was real?
That Edwin hubble law wikipedia.
Does big bang violate the first law of thermodynamics?
No - because the big bang assumes there was a singularity that contained all of what became the mass and energy of the universe we all know and love. In essence, the first law states "you can't get something from nothing" and the big bang assume there was something to start from - even if we can't exactly define what that something was.
Ideas like the big bang make it impossible to believe in god?
No the opposite is true actually. The law of cause and effect is one of the fundamental principles of physics. According to the Big Bang theory, all the matter and energy in the universe were concentrated in one area. This leaves the ulitmate question 'where did this energy and matter come from?' The Big Bang theory is a physical answer to an eternal question. That is why it falls short of being the ultimate theory that it claims to be. Who created the Big Bang? Things DONT just happen for the sake of it.
Why did many astronomers not believe Hubble's law?
The Big Bang Theory predicted that galaxies should be moving apart, just as Edwin Hubble suggested. The theory soon became popular and acknowledged as the standard universe-creation theory. However, Hubble’s theory can not explain: o The location of the singularity point, and how it started o The density and the mass of the singularity point to construct this huge universe 38 o The Big Bang Theory talked about things that occurred after the Big Bang, but not before or during its occurrence. o The explosion of the singularity point should have made the universe identical and harmonized. Although the Big Bang Theory made some predictions that corresponded with some observations and discoveries, the theory left many things to be explained and improved, see my book “The Atom and the Universe” at Amazon.com
How was universe created over and over?
Who says it was? We have no evidence whatsoever that there are other universes, or that the universe is somehow cyclic. In fact, it's quite likely that we can never have proof of that, since we'd have to somehow go outside the universe to check. Good luck with that. Einstein's theory explained the Big Bang. He said 'we are like insects living in a bubble and when the bubble expand, that is call the big bang.' But what happen before the Big Bang? that is when string theory comes in. Strings theory says that there are other universes out there, there is no rule law of physics that says 'multi universes cannot exists'. where the big bang came from? when the two universes collide, it can form another universe, when the universe spit in half, it becomes two universe. That is what physicists think 'that is the big bang.
Is there a loophole in big bang theory?
It is important to first realize that the big bang theory is a theory; it is not a physical law on its own for which there might be loopholes. However, I think (correct me if I am wrong though), that you are referring to the idea that the big bang theory states that the Universe started with a bang which just came into being out of nothing. This is not entirely correct, the big bang theory does not implicitly say that the Universe came into being at some point; it only says that in the distant past the Universe was very small and that it has been expanding ever since. This statement is well verified by observations and measurements. It does not claim or explain how the Universe came into being. It might sound reasonable that the Universe somehow came into being as a point, and it would fit with the above statements, but the creation of the Universe itself is not yet something that science can say much about. There are models, such as string theory, that sometimes have things to say about this, but they are far from testable at this stage. So, yes, it is possible that something else happened before the Universe became tiny and started to expand, and it wouldn't contradict with the big bang theory at all.
What are the six laws which serve as arguments for creation?
There are many laws of the universe and nature. I don't know of six but here are a few: law of gravity; law of biogenises; law of thermodynamics, law of physics, law of genetics. Then there is the supporting ideas from the Big Bang Theory, and observations of the physical universe.
Did Dabney Coleman appear on the Big Bang Theory?
Mr. Coleman's list of appearances does not mention any on The Big Bang Theory, and he does not appear on any list of guest stars for that show.HOWEVER, the character of Mike Rostenkowski (Bernadette's father; Howard's father in law) -- portrayed by Casey Sander -- could easily have been done by Dabney Coleman. Mike has a gruff, somewhat nasty personality, like many characters Mr. Coleman has portrayed.
