Nonfiction...
Facts need to be proven by strong evidence, data, and reliable sources. They should be verifiable and supported by research or empirical observations to establish their accuracy and credibility.
A well-supported hypothesis is a theory that appears to have a lot of evidence behind it. This evidence helps to make it seem likely that the hypothesis is true, but it is still just a theory until it has been proven.
bc scientific theories are hypotheses tested enough to be supported by evidence, and a fact is a proven thing. scientific theories are only right until theyre proven wrong
No, an allegation is an unproven claim or assertion made by someone. It is not considered evidence unless it has been substantiated or supported by facts, proof, or credible sources. Allegations are simply accusations that need to be investigated and proven through evidence.
A claim becomes a fact when it can be proven to be true through evidence, data, or supporting documentation that is widely accepted as reliable and accurate by experts in the field. Facts are objective and verifiable, whereas claims are statements that may or may not be supported by evidence.
Hypothesis are theories which are yet to be proven. They are proven when they are proved to be true as in experiments.
A substantiated opinion is an opinion that is supported by evidence, facts, data, or reasoning. It is based on information that can be verified or proven to be true, rather than just personal beliefs or feelings.
A fact is something that has been proven to be true through observation or evidence. A theory, on the other hand, is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon that is supported by evidence but has not been definitively proven. The key distinction is that facts are confirmed information, while theories are explanations for how or why something happens.
The results are any known information that has been proven with some type of evidence. Also it has gone through a judge which has declared it proven evidence and a proven result.
Currently there is no proof or even strong evidence of life on Mars. Analysis of minerals has proven that there was once liquid water, and some chemical evidence suggests that there were once complex organic compounds. This means that Mars might have once supported life, but again, there is no solid evidence.
The question most closely matches the definition of a literary legend. A legend, unlike a myth or folktale, is neither proven to be true nor proven to be false. It is usually a story told that the listener perceives it to have taken place in human history without any substantial backing evidence.
there is no direct evidence but its a theory but can be proven