Linen made from the stems of the flax plant
Linen fibres from the flax plant, but palm fibres and papyrus fibres were also widely used.
The main industries of Ethiopia include... Oil exportation, Clothing, and leather. Bulls and cows are used to make leather.
no but u can get mummified Egyptian style but it costs a lot of money
it is a lever used in the egyptian times
An ancient Egyptian harpist
Today, hieroglyphics are only used as decorations, particularly to convey an Egyptian theme.
Egyptian became the region's language. They used Egyptian names and clothing. They also did Egyptian religious practices
They used plant fiber animal skin
usually they used Egyptian silk.
Egyptian became the region's language. They used Egyptian names and clothing. They also did Egyptian religious practices
Linen was used to make Egyptian clothing throughout the Old, Middle, and New Kingdoms. Linen was made from flax, and at best was transparent, though could sometimes be as crude as sack cloth.
Martex fiber can be used for such things as decorative pillows, day beds, bedrests, punching bags, toys, and can be used for many other clothing, home, and building products.
The most common plants used to make clothing are bamboo, hemp, and cotton. Cotton is one of the most used products in the world.
Yes. Many pieces of clothing are made from plant fibers. For example, Hemp and cotton are frequently used in clothes.
to keep your body warm....
Linens, cotton, and wool. Even today Egyptian cotton is considered prime cotton.
One of their main resource was buffalo. They used it for clothing, food, and weapons.
Whenever a fiber found on the clothing of a victim matches the known fibers of a suspect's clothing, it can be a significant event. Matching dyed synthetic fibers or dyed natural fibers can be very meaningful, whereas the matching of common fibers such as white cotton or blue denim cotton would be less significant. In some situations, however, the presence of white cotton or blue denim cotton may still have some meaning in resolving the truth of an issue. The discovery of cross transfers and multiple fiber transfers between the suspect's clothing and the victim's clothing dramatically increases the likelihood that these two individuals had physical contact.When a fiber examiner matches a questioned fiber to a known item of clothing, there are only two possible explanations:The fiber actually originated from the item of clothing, orThe fiber did not originate from the item of clothing.In order to say that the fiber originated from the item of clothing, the clothing either had to be the only fabric of its type ever produced or still remaining on earth, or the transfer of fibers was directly observed. Since neither of these situations is likely to occur or be known, fiber examiners will conclude that the fibers could have originated from the clothing or that the fibers are consistent with originating from the clothing. The only way to say that a fiber did not originate from a particular item of clothing is to know the actual history of the garment or to have actually observed the fiber transfer from another garment.It is argued that the large volume of fabric produced reduces the significance of any fiber association discovered in a criminal case. It can never be stated with certainty that a fiber originated from a particular garment because other garments were likely produced using the same fiber type and color. The inability to positively associate a fiber with a particular garment to the exclusion of all other garments, however, does not mean that the fiber association is without value.Back to the top