Using the correct rules is always the best method for getting accurate results.
If there is a factor that confuses the result of an experiment, I would call that a design flaw in the experiment. It might also be an uncontrolled variable.
Lie detection technologies are not especially accurate; the polygraph test is the iconic method and is considered unreliable by the US National Academy of Sciences. It measures quantities like heart rate, which can fluctuate in response to stress. This stress may be the result of lying, or the result of taking a polygraph test, which is itself stressful. Other lie detection technologies exist, such as voice analysis, but no such method has been proven reliable.
true or false : in order to get the best results from an experiment, change as many variables as possible within the experiment?
Positively charged.
The word you're probably looking for is "confirmation". Technically, the result of an experiment is always "true", in that it represents what really happened. This may or may not be what you expected to happen. and there may be factors you're unaware of, but still, the result is truly what did happen.
because mohar method gives the accurate result
it helps guide the experiment toward accurant repetable result
because when different people use the same method the result are not equal for different people. this will bring the big uncertainty of result
Scientific experiment must be conduct where the result of the hypothesis tested must be accurate, repeatable - reproducible and without bias. To sum up to the requirement, set of the methods and norm is sum up and become scientific methodology. Without accuracy, repeatability and credibility then the experiment would worth nothing.
if you mean the result from an experiment, then yes. you ask a question, form a hypothesis, preform an experiment, and you get data. you analysis the data and this should tell you whether your hypothesis was right or wrong. this is the scientific method
Scientific experiment must be conduct where the result of the hypothesis tested must be accurate, repeatable - reproducible and without bias. To sum up to the requirement, set of the methods and norm is sum up and become scientific methodology. Without accuracy, repeatability and credibility then the experiment would worth nothing.
It depends on what kind of experiment you are performing, an experiment can never be entirely accurate but the more times you perform them, the more of an accurate result you will get.Answer:An experiment in a school lab is more correctly a demonstration. The errors are caused by unfamiliarity with the equipment, methods, or recording of results.In a research laboratory an experiment is reaching into new areas. The potential variables are not all known. Lack of the control of these variables can cause error in the results.
The result of a scientific experiment is the conclusion.
The result of an experiment is a conclusion.data..?
Religion is important during an experiment because it tells you if the results are consistent. If you didn't repeat portions of the experiment, than you wouldn't be able to gain accurate results.
becuz that way u get an accurate result at the end of the experiment and any calculations done would give you the right answer.
Repeated Trails are the number of trails done during a scientific experiment with the purpose of getting a more accurate result.