Want this question answered?
The method of uranium-lead dating.
It would be possible to find the age of a tree using radiocarbon dating. This is because as a tree lays down each of its growth rings it is only the outer layers which continue to exchange carbon with the atmosphere. Therefore, by dating a sample of wood from the INNER ring of the tree you could find out when it first began to grow. Unfortunately this process would be slightly pointless for two reasons, firstly you would have to kill the tree, and secondly dendrochronology, or tree ring dating remains the most accurate dating method available to archaeologists (where a suitable sample can be found) so it would make much more sense to just count the rings (if the tree was still living) or use dendrochronology to match up the rings and find a date (if the tree has been dead).
Depends on how accurate your results need to be. If you're not using grade A or B glassware and its just a standard beaker then the effect of the residual water will be negligible compared to the calibration error of the beaker.
A direct method of course would be by analysing Rock samples
If it covers a larger area it would be more accurate, and if it was under open sky it would be more accurate, otherwise it wont allow the water to get to it.
A lack of accurate results APEX :D
Carbon-14 dating would be the most appropriate radiometric dating method for dating artifacts found at effigy mounds. This method is commonly used for dating organic materials such as wood, charcoal, or bone, which are typically found in archaeological sites like effigy mounds.
a accurate result would be true as possible but a reliable result would be one that is compared
I would look on Match or eHarmony. They have the best results out of all the dating sites.
Very, the more accurate the the measurements the more accurate the results, thus furthering more accurate tests down the road based on said results. The more tests you do on bad results the further off the results get with every test you do. Changing the independent of the test with bad measurements would void a result.
Radiocarbon dating.
Laser Ceilometer
Depending on how much body fat you have, the most accurate method for measuring body fat is eitherDual-emission X-ray absorptiometryHydrostatic WeighingIf you are not morbidly obese, #1 would be most accurate.
No. Potassium decays to argon, and geologists measure argon as the daughter material. The half life is too long for 1000 years to give sensible results.
You can divide it by the numbers of plants so that it is accurate.
The method of uranium-lead dating.
Carbon-14