they would be like "Hi, im Bob." lol jk i have no idea. But since they are genetically modified they would probably be stronger and healthier then the other fish. So based on that you can write something.
If the GM fish were stronger, healthier, or grew faster, they might cannibalize the others. If the facility maintained a non-GM breeding stock, that should be end of it once the GM fish were removed. But it depends on what sort of new gene(s) were inserted.
John Alec Beardmore has written: 'Genetically modified organisms and aquaculture'
As far as is known, peaches have not been genetically modified.
Only if the ingredients contain genetically modified organisms.
Bt cotton is an example of genetically modified organism.
It is not likely that they will.
the estimated age of a child that is genetically modified when it dies is 122
An apple called Arctic Apple has been genetically modified to be non-browning.
There is a lot of talk about how genetically modified food is needed, but no real evidence that it is needed.
It really depends what type of genetically modified crop it is
In general, non-genetically modified foods of any type (including whole soybeans) are preferred to the their genetically modified counterparts because the long-term health effects of consuming genetically modified foods have not been properly documented yet. There may be unanticipated health risks with consuming certain genetically modified foods.
No commercially available potatoes in the US are currently genetically modified, though there is ongoing research on them.
genetically modified are much more healthier than normal tomatoes?"