The photoelectric effect is supported by the particle theory of light, which suggests that light consists of individual packets of energy called photons. When light of a certain frequency interacts with a material, photons can transfer their energy to electrons in the material, causing them to be emitted.
The photoelectric effect supports the particle model. This doesn't mean the particle model is "right" and the wave model is "wrong", just that in this particular experiment, the particle model better explains the observed results.
Yes, it does. And before you react to the "wise guy" answer, let's look at what's happening in photoelectric effect. By the time we're done with a simple explanation, you'll see that this phenomenon deals with both particles and waves. Light is energy. It's electromagnetic energy, to be more precise. And when this energy, which is carried by a photon, impinges on a material, the energy can be transferred to the electrons around the atoms of the material. These electrons, which are particles, take that energy and escape from atoms with it. They (the electrons) are kicked into higher Fermi energy levels and this sets up the conditions for the application of this principle to the generation of electricity. By selecting certain materials and making a suitable structure, we can create a photovoltaic cell. Those electrons that were kicked out can be harnessed, and this cell, when exposed to light, will generate voltage, or electromagnetic force. The voltage, this photovoltaic energy, can be applied in all the ways "regular" electricity can be used. A link can be found below. A link can be found below for more information.
The photoelectric effect supports the particle model.
That doesn't mean the particle model is "right" and the wave model is "wrong".
The electromagnetic phenomena involved in light have properties of both models.
In this particular experiment, the particle model better explains the observed results.
The photon or particle form. A single photon reacting with a single electron.
The photo-electric effect depends on the particle nature of light.
At the simplest level it was the Bohr model.
No, the Gold foil experiment supported the plum pudding model of the atom proposed by J.J. Thomson. It was later replaced by the Rutherford model, where atoms have a dense, positively charged nucleus, surrounded by electrons orbiting like planets around the sun.
There are to possible answers to this question... If what you are mixing is light (like the TV/Monitors does)... or if what you are mixing pigments (like inks, crayons, etc)... In the case of light, Red Light and Green Light will give you Yellow Light... (for example when you are working with the RGB system you have to look at it like this... this is called Additive Colors) In the case of inks, (for example the CMYK color model, that will be called Subtractive Colors) The resulting color will be a shade of brown.
Atomic model of DemocritusAtomic model of DaltonAtomic model of ThomsonAtomic model of RutherfordAtomic model of BohrAtomic model of SommerfeldSchrödinger model
Now, an advanced model derived from the Niels Bohr theory.
The wave model of light describes light as an electromagnetic wave that exhibits properties like interference and diffraction. The particle model of light, on the other hand, describes light as a stream of particles called photons. Phenomena like the photoelectric effect and Compton scattering can only be explained by the particle model of light, where light behaves as discrete particles (photons) interacting with matter.
The particle model of light, known as the photon theory, describes light as being made up of individual packets of energy called photons. Photons have characteristics of both particles and waves, depending on how they are observed. This model helps explain phenomena such as the photoelectric effect and the behavior of light in certain experiments.
The wave model of light does not explain certain behaviors of light, such as the photoelectric effect, where light behaves as discrete particles (photons) instead of a continuous wave. This discrepancy led to the development of the dual nature of light, which incorporates both wave and particle properties to fully describe its behavior.
The wave model of light best explains interference phenomena. According to this model, light travels in the form of waves, which can interfere constructively or destructively when they overlap, leading to the observed interference patterns. This wave nature of light is a key principle in understanding phenomena such as interference.
It does not explain the photoelectric effect. According to the wave theory, given light of sufficient intensity, electrons should be emitted from the surface of a metal. What is observed though, is that given light of sufficient frequency, electrons will be emitted from the metal surface independent of intensity. If the frequency is too low, electrons will NOT be emitted even if the highest intensity of light was used. Albert Einstein suggested that it would be possible to explain the photoelectric effect if light was considered to be made up of particles instead of waves. The energy of the particles of light, called photons, would be proportional to the frequency of the light. Electrons would be emitted from the metal only if the energy of ONE photon was sufficient for the electron on the metal surface to break bonds and escape from the surface. Otherwise, the photons will rebound on the metal surface with no emission of electrons. Einstein 'mathematised' the photoelectric effect in the following equation: hf = Ekmax + o where h is the planck constant f is the frequency of the radiation Ekmax is the maximum kinetic energy of the emitted electrons o is the work-function energy, that is the minimum energy required for the electron to escape from the metal surface. Note: hf is the energy of a photon. It was for the explanation of the photoelectric effect that Einstein was awarded the Nobel prize in Physics in 1921. (and not for his still greater discoveries in relation to relativity)
The wave model for radiation does not account for the photoelectric effect because it predicts that the energy transferred to electrons should depend on the intensity (amplitude) of the radiation, when in reality it depends on the frequency of the radiation. The photoelectric effect can only be explained by the particle nature of light, as described by Einstein's photon hypothesis.
supports photon particle model as E=hf is supplied in discrete corpuscular quanta; increasing Intensity below fo gives no photoemission (not cumulative as suggested by wave theory- theoretically there will only be delay until photoemmission)
supports photon particle model as E=hf is supplied in discrete corpuscular quanta; increasing Intensity below fo gives no photoemission (not cumulative as suggested by wave theory- theoretically there will only be delay until photoemmission)
The particle model of light explains how light can exhibit both wave-like and particle-like properties. It describes light as being composed of individual particles called photons, which can behave as waves in certain situations, such as interference and diffraction. This model helps to explain a wide range of phenomena, from the photoelectric effect to the dual nature of light.
Photo electric emisson or photo electric effect
The Big Bang Model!
The Rutherford model, or the nuclear model