This is a hard question to answer generally, but they should judge whether or not a child should be able to play a game based on the rating and the child's age. If they want to judge less generally, they could play the game themselves for awhile and decide themselves if the content is suitable for their children or not.
To always be safe and use a condom.
They have none, and don't need to. It is up to the moral compass of the purchaser to decide what he is mature enough to handle.
approves of the act.
to live laugh and love! :)
Moral Idealism is a belief that individual rights and responsibilities are universal, regardless of outcome.
i think that moral obligation seem more important than legal responsibilities because moral obligation is the duty or responsibility in which he feels honour that why i think that moral obligation seem more important than legal responsibilities.
i believe moral
because there the parents dauhhh
The moral of the Hunger Games is to stand up for what you believe in and what you think is right.
The parents' responsibilities are to care for and teach their children until the children grow up.Parents BASIC responsibilities include :Grow up children in comfort and lavish facilities without any problemsTo educate their children highlyTo teach them moral valuesTo educate them about their culture, tradition, religion, languageTeach them mannersTeach them to have good behavior and helping nature which does not create problems furtherMake them realize their responsibilities towards family, home and societyMake them aware of social problems they will face when they become independentTeach them how to maintain relationships with love, care, trust and justice.
Parents have a right to impose any rules that are legal, moral , not dangerous, and not abusive.
The moral is to give parents excuse to ignore their children by saying: it not so good to have perfect parents, it can be a disaster if you are not satisfied with your parents, so bear with your parents no matter what they do to you!