chedder cheese on one slice of bologna and your mom
Yes he did. He was a true revolutionary and felt that unless there was a change in government that it would grow too big and become entrenched. You have to remember that in the 1700's most of his world was farming and his views were from that perspective. He was an anti federalist and that was his main disagreement with Adams.
People who cannot protect or defend themselves, from the age of newborn to age 14 most children will not be able to protect themselves from harm. Also old people who are fragile cannot protect themselves as someone who would be middle-aged.
To most people, the function would be pretty obvious. It is to protect the feet of the wearer from injury.
An African American during the Great Depression probably would have felt that the New Deal mostly helped white people and not others.
Most of the country was a vast expanse of wilderness in Jackson's day. Nobody felt any need to protect any wilderness. Even the cities in the west would seem like wilderness to people today.
To most people, the function would be pretty obvious. It is to protect the feet of the wearer from injury.
To most people, the function would be pretty obvious. It is to protect the feet of the wearer from injury.
to protect the people
Probably safe to assume not at all since most people would just not use it if they felt it was. Nothing can irritate anyone unless it is permitted to do so.
They protect the rights of the people.
Most people have a cup to drink from. Some people have a cup to protect their testicles.
The virtue that applies most to acting to protect or support other people is Charity.