Too much is unknown. It depends upon the statutes of your state - your past record - the viciousness of the crime - etc - etc.
Bloom and Politan Open Court - 2006 Husband Guilty of Murder was released on: USA: 1 May 2009
Only when they found the kid guilty of murder and of course what type of murder
Lie detector test is one of the due process investigation of the suspect. but this is not the basis of the case if the suspect is guilty of the charges.
Worst-case scenario - you could be sentenced to death
Yes it is but technically, even though the actions charged are the same the laws charged have to be different. It has happened that a person has been found innocent of a murder in a state court, but later charged with and found guilty of violating or depriving the victim of his/her civil rights by causing the murder. The action is the same, the murder, but the charges are different. This is actually a very fine distinction and not everyone would agree that this is not a violation of the right against double jeopardy.
Once they are arraigned. This occurs when a suspect (now a defendant) is brought before a court and informed of the charges against them, which is when they must offer a plea of "guilty", "not guilty" or in some cases "no contest" (nolo contendere).
The word "innocent" means the same as "not guilty". But nowhere apart from Scotland is anyone "found innocent". That is because in all common law systems, accused persons are presumed innocent unless proven to be guilty. If there is not enough proof that the person is guilty, he is found to be "not guilty" even though there is no proof of his innocence. The OJ Simpson case is a case in point. One court found that there was more evidence of his guilt than there was of his innocence, but another court found that there was not enough evidence of his guilt to find that he was proven guilty of the crime. He was therefore found not guilty although no court would find him innocent.
Whichever court you are being tried in determines your sentence.
In a Murder case to successfully solve a murder you must be able to prove that an individual is the suspect and guilty of the crime being charged. In order to do this police need the following a informant ,a piece of evidence (dna,shoe print, shell casing etc), or surveillance( I know i spelled it incorrect who cares!). But the most useful and best source is what? You guess it lets say it together " A Witness" that can testify in court. If you have a witness on your murder case your then your looking at a possible conviction!.
In court trials, the two outcomes are either "guilty" or "not guilty". Therefore, any one who is not found to be guilty is declared to be not guilty and will be free to leave the court. There is not verdict of "innocent" in virtually any court in the world.
In traffic court you can plead in the following manner: Guilty - Not Guilty - No Contest - or (in some traffic courts) Guilty With An Explanation.
In legal terms, arraignment refers to the formal process in which a defendant is brought before a court to hear the charges filed against them and enter a plea (i.e., guilty or not guilty). During arraignment, the defendant is informed of their rights and may have the opportunity to request legal counsel. It is an important step in the criminal justice process.