There were many new arguments made to support slavery. Some argued that slaves were needed so that there would be enough man-power to feed the country.
To end an argument about slavery in the territories (apex)
No (New respondent) He opposed slavery. And he was 'Sumner', not 'Summer'.
It put the slavery question to a local vote in each new state.
Generally speaking, Northerners and Northern politicians believed that slavery should not be allowed to expand to new territories or new states. Part of their argument was negated in 1857 by a ruling by the US Supreme Court which said slavery was constitutional.
Yes, an argument with a tautologous conclusion can be considered invalid because it does not provide any new information or reasoning to support its conclusion.
it made them fat and weird.
They would not have enough state votes to pass the constitution if slavery was outlawed by it. The south would have voted against it.
Its main purpose was to oppose the expansion of slavery in the western territories, with the argument that free men in free soil make up a system morally and economically superior to that of slavery.
they could guarantee there would be no more slavery by the new law the government made:)
Many abolitionists refused to support the Missouri Compromise because it allowed for the expansion of slavery into new territories, which went against their goal of ending slavery altogether. They believed that compromising on the issue would only serve to perpetuate the institution of slavery.
A circular argument is a logical fallacy in which the conclusion is supported by the premise, which in turn is based on the conclusion. It does not provide any new information or evidence to support the argument. It's a form of reasoning that goes in a circle without ever reaching a logical conclusion.
Breckenridge found support primarily in the southern and western regions of the United States, particularly among Democrats and those who aligned with his pro-slavery stance. His political base was strongest in states where slavery was deeply entrenched, as well as among constituents who favored the expansion of slavery into new territories. This support was crucial during his campaign for the presidency in 1860.