0
There were many new arguments made to support slavery. Some argued that slaves were needed so that there would be enough man-power to feed the country.
What else can I help you with?
What was the purpose of the Missouri Compromise?
To end an argument about slavery in the territories (apex)
Did Charles Summer support or oppose slavery?
No (New respondent) He opposed slavery. And he was 'Sumner', not 'Summer'.
How did the Kansas-Nebraska Act support expansion of slavery?
It put the slavery question to a local vote in each new state.
What was northern white abolitionist's view on slavery?
Generally speaking, Northerners and Northern politicians believed that slavery should not be allowed to expand to new territories or new states. Part of their argument was negated in 1857 by a ruling by the US Supreme Court which said slavery was constitutional.
Can an argument with a tautologous conclusion be considered invalid?
Yes, an argument with a tautologous conclusion can be considered invalid because it does not provide any new information or reasoning to support its conclusion.
How did slavery affect colonial new york?
it made them fat and weird.
Why did new England support slavery when ratifying the constitution?
They would not have enough state votes to pass the constitution if slavery was outlawed by it. The south would have voted against it.
What was the main goal of the free soil party?
Its main purpose was to oppose the expansion of slavery in the western territories, with the argument that free men in free soil make up a system morally and economically superior to that of slavery.
How could the government guarantee there would be no more slavery?
they could guarantee there would be no more slavery by the new law the government made:)
Why did many abolitionists refuse to support the Missouri Compromise?
Many abolitionists refused to support the Missouri Compromise because it allowed for the expansion of slavery into new territories, which went against their goal of ending slavery altogether. They believed that compromising on the issue would only serve to perpetuate the institution of slavery.
What is circular argument?
A circular argument is a logical fallacy in which the conclusion is supported by the premise, which in turn is based on the conclusion. It does not provide any new information or evidence to support the argument. It's a form of reasoning that goes in a circle without ever reaching a logical conclusion.
Did North Carolina support slavery at the constitutional convention?
Yes, North Carolina supported slavery at the Constitutional Convention of 1787. Delegates from the state, like those from other Southern states, advocated for the protection of slavery in the new Constitution. They were concerned about the potential loss of their slave-based economy and sought to ensure that the institution of slavery would be preserved and recognized in the framework of the new government. The resulting compromises, such as the Three-Fifths Compromise, reflected this support.
