You can call the publishers for the last 300 years and ask them. The sheer number of copies published in various countries in multiple languages pretty much makes it a surety. Even Mao's Little Red Book, or the Koran haven't come close to hitting the numbers.
The estimates are that over 5 billion copies of The Bible have been printed and sold or given away. Mao's Little Red Book is around 900,000 and the Qu'ran is at 800,000.
Perhaps Amazon or Publishers Clearing House.
"Biased" means that the source shows favoritism towards a particular viewpoint or group, which can lead to a lack of objectivity or fairness in its reporting. In the context of evaluating a source, if it is considered biased, it means that the information presented may be one-sided or influenced by personal opinions or agendas.
Yes, a primary source can be biased because it reflects the perspective or agenda of the individual who created it. It's important to consider the potential biases of a primary source when analyzing and interpreting its information.
biased
bias rule
"Reviews of online colleges can be tricky. Generally, look to confirm the information with at least one other source. Reveiws that come from a organization versus a website are more accurate than those done by ""survey""."
A for AUTHOR-who wrote it. B for BIASED- is the source one sided. C for CONTEXT-what does the source tell you. D for DATE-when was the source written.
What was the author's purpose
using a biased, suspicious, or incredible source to defend a conclusion
No, they are a nonpartisan source for healthcare information.
A biased error is one that is caused by a factor inherent to the source of the error. An unbiased error is one that comes from anywhere.
Local newspaper. (study island)
No definite source to confirm that. In reality maybe 1000+