0
What of following types of statement cannot be used to explain the steps of a proof?
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What type of statement cannot be used to explain the steps of a proof?
A logically inconsistent statement.
which statement is missing from the following proof theorem: vertical angles are congruent.?
A+
which of the following reasons can be used for statement 8 of the proof?
definition of perpendicular lines
Which of the following reasons can be used for statement 5 of the proof?
substitution property of equality
Which statement that cannot be used to justify the steps of a proof?
Since you didn't include the statements in your question there is no way for us to know
Which of the following types of statement cannot be used to explain the steps of a proof Check all that apply?
Conjecture and Guess.
Which of the following can be used to explain a statement in a geometric proof Check all that apply?
Corollary.Theorem.Definition.Postulate.
What type of statement cannot be used to explain the steps of a proof?
A logically inconsistent statement.
Which of the following can be used to explain the statement in a geometric proof Check all that apply. (Apex)?
Corollary.Theorem.Definition.Postulate.
Which of the following can be used to explain a statement in a geometic proof?
Well the scientific proof provides that we americans can be awesome. Thank you. xD
What types of statement can be used to explain the steps of a proof?
The corollaries types of statement is what is used to explain the steps of a proof.
What types of the statement can be used to explain the steps of a proof?
The corollaries types of statement is what is used to explain the steps of a proof.
Which types of statements can justify the steps of proof?
which of the following types of statement can be used to explain the steps of proof?
What exactly is proof in 467?
There cannot be a proof because the statement is not true.nowhere does the statement say
What is the proof showing that the heights of a triangle are concurrent?
There cannot be a proof because the statement need not be true.
What is used to explain a statement in a geometric proof?
Postulate, Corollary, Definition, & Theorem
which statement is missing from the following proof theorem: vertical angles are congruent.?
A+
