Sharecroppers could have planted:
Let the landowner decide what to plant.
Let the landowner decide what to plant.
The sharecroppers were able to purchase goods on credit for a mortgage or lien on the farmer's crop. The merchant would advance supplies such as food, clothes, or tools in return.
The Sharecroppers farmers in the south will like not prosper after the war.
They were no longer enslaved but many became sharecroppers.
No, all sharecroppers were not African American
Technically, sharecroppers were not slaves. They did not own land so they borrowed land from rich land owners in return for some of the profit. Sharecroppers could plant what they liked, and basically do what they wanted, just as long as the land owner got his fair share of the profit.
Sharecroppers were charged high interest rates and had to give a portion of their crops to the landowners. This meant that most sharecroppers lived in poverty with little chance to own land or homes of their own.
They sharecroppers would give tools, housing, food and other necessities to the workers in return for their work. Then the workers would get half of the profit. This kind of system did not work really well in LA. The sharecroppers were usually in debt so they could not pay their workers, and we caught up in a credit cycle.
An advantage of sharecropping over slavery was that sharecroppers had more independence and autonomy in their work. While still facing challenges, sharecroppers had the opportunity to negotiate terms and potentially earn a share of the profits from their labor.
The best plant food for grass is schultz plant food.
So many freedmen and poor whites became sharecroppers.