You mean apart from the highly lame, "Thou art a villain."? Well, he calls him "boy" and also uses the form "Thou art" rather than "you are". The "thou art" form was the one used with servants, implying that Romeo was an inferior (that is why it died out in polite conversation). Basically, Tybalt was pretty feeble at insults; he could use a lesson from Kent in King Lear, or Falstaff.
When Tybalt returns to the scene, Romeo arrives and tries to reason with him and prevent a fight. However, Tybalt taunts Romeo and challenges him to a duel. In a moment of passionate anger and grief over Mercutio's death, Romeo ends up fighting with Tybalt and kills him.
The prince doesn't sentence Romeo to death because: 1) If Romeo didn't kill Tybalt, he would've been executed anyway 2) Tybalt would've killed Romeo if Mercutio hadn't stepped in. Mercutio died because Tybalt killed him, and Tybalt died because Romeo killed him. 3) Tybalt paid the price for killing Mercutio, and when the prince asked who would "pay" for Mercutio's death, Montague said Romeo shouldn't have to because they were good friends, and Romeo killed Tybalt to avenge Mercutio.
"Give me my rapier, boy." It was a chance for a fight.He is extremely rude and wants to fight him. He assumes that somehow Romeo's attendance at the party is intended to insult the Capulets. For Tybalt, anything will do for an excuse to fight.
These words were spoken by Lord Capulet in Act 3, Scene 1 of Romeo and Juliet. Lord Capulet is appealing to Prince Escalus for justice after Tybalt is killed by Romeo. He insists that Romeo must pay for his crime with his life.
He ran to Friar Lawrence's cell, there to await developments. He is there when the Friar brings news of his banishment. He is also there when the nurse comes looking for him with news of Juliet.
It would spoil the party and besides Romeo seems to be a nice guy.
The Prince banishes Romeo from Verona for killing Tybalt in Act 3.
he is surprised that Tybalt is getting the better of him and he thinks Romeo's love for rosaline has made him effeminate (he doesnt know about Juliet) so he decides to fight in his place - m and t had already had a war of words before romeo came in anyway so they were all already wound up. it didnt take much then to kick m off into a fight - especially when he was so cocky and confident assuming romeo would defend himself
By the law of Verona, yes. He had killed someone in a street brawl, which was a capital offence. It is this fact that Benvolio urges in Romeo's defence--that Romeo was only carrying out the law. Looked at more broadly, one might argue that nobody, no matter what they have done, should be killed in an act of private vengeance, and that such a death is wrongful. It is on this basis that the Prince finds Romeo guilty and banishes him. Looked at even more broadly, we might consider that the infliction of the death penalty, even for the crime committed by Tybalt, is excessive and unjustified. And at the same time we might consider that it is a kind of poetic justice that someone as addicted to quarrelling as Tybalt was should die in this manner. He who lives by the sword should die by the sword. And taking the broadest possible view, we might consider that since everyone without exception is certain to die, talking about whether they deserve death is silly. It is their destiny. All we can talk about is whether the time and manner of the death is appropriate, as it surely is for Tybalt. One is reminded of the quotation from the Lord of the Rings: "Deserves [death]! I daresay he does. Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement."
Romeo says "villain am I none; Therefore farewell; I see thou know'st me not." Tybalt has just called Romeo a villain, hoping he'll start a fight. But Romeo says, "I'm not a villain; clearly you don't know me, because if you did, you'd know I wasn't a villain." Of course, Tybalt also doesn't know that Romeo is his kinsman by marriage, which is why Romeo won't fight, but Romeo knew this beforehand and so is not implied in "I SEE thou know'st me not" Romeo does not say "Thou knowst you not." That is a misquotation and you mustn't do it. When you make a quotation, you must put it down exactly as it is written in the text. You cannot freely substitute "you" for "me"--this is totally wrong, as you must know if you speak English at all. When you go into a restaurant, you don't say "Give you a cup of coffee, please."
Act 3 begins when Tybalt fights Mercutio, Benvolio and Romeo. Tybalt kills Mercutio and Romeo kills Tybalt in revenge so Prince Escalus banishes Romeo from Verona. Then, back at the Capulets, the Nurse brings Juliet news of Tybalts death and Romeos banishment and Juliet tells the Nurse to give Romeo a ring and tell him that she still loves him. The Nurse finds Romeo at Friar Lawrance's church where he is overcome with grief and she gives him the ring and Romeo is happy again. Then he goes to Juliet's room to say goodbye and have sex with her. After that, Capulet and Lady Capulet come in and tell Juliet that she is arranged to marry Paris on Thursday and tell her that if she refuses, they will no longer consider her their daughter. So she comes up with a plan to be with Romeo.
Hard to say. We hear Romeo say what he thinks of Juliet ("I ne'er saw true beauty till this night.") then our attention is drawn to Tybalt and his conversation with Capulet. When Romeo next speaks he is holding Juliet's hand ("If I profane with my unworthiest hand . . .") What are Romeo and Juliet doing when Tybalt and Capulet are fighting? The text does not give us much help, except that Tybalt and Capulet actually discuss Romeo at the beginning of their conversation, and so presumably look at him, so it would not work to have him in a clinch with Juliet at this point. In some productions, Romeo sneaks up on Juliet and grabs her hand, so she does not see him until he is already holding her hand and asking to kiss her. In these cases, you could describe her reaction as amazement.