0
What part of a knights armour would he have to lift if he wanted to eat or drink?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
A knight would not eat or drink in their armour, instead they would eat in their normal clothes, but if the knight was in need of some water in the middle of battle he could lift the visor on his helmet, although this is only possible with certain helmets like bassonets that have a movable visor
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Does knights in armor connected to form and function?
yes knights in armour are connected to form and function. Form: If the armour did not work then the knights would not of used it. Function: And the function is to protect you from a sword.
Who would win 50 knights or 50 musketeers?
Musket pellets wouldn't penetrate armour, and take ages to reload, so probably knights!
What would knights do when not in battle?
play chess drink train
Who would help the knights get ready before battle?
The knights squire would help him get on his armour and mount his horse, the Squire was also expected to go in aid of his Knight if he fell of his horse or was wounded in battle.
When where the middle age knights?
a knight is a person of different ages that fight demends etc. knights are men but not all of them are women. knights always have wepons and practice everyday. they would have shields,swords knives etc. and they always well must of them have armour on
Why did knigths only on horseback wear full body armor?
Knights on horseback were like a tank to the middle ages. They had horses that were trained to carry a man in armour and to be controlled with the knees. They would form a line knee to knee and with the full armour they were very powerful.
Why did the dane sleep with their armor on?
The Danes wanted to be prepared for Grendel's attack. They would not have time to put on armour while the beast was attacking.
Why did danes sleep with their armor on?
The Danes wanted to be prepared for Grendel's attack. They would not have time to put on armour while the beast was attacking.
Is the invention of metal armor allowed knights to use lances true?
no.the invention of the stirrup allowed knights to use lances.(armour protects, but its the stirrup that allows the knight to control the horse better, and be braced against the impact of a lance that would otherwise knock the rider from the saddle)
Who would win a battle between spartan 300 and medievil knights?
I will start by saying the film "300" isn't a true depiction of a Spartan soldier, they did infact were heavy armor.In doing so they were a Hoplite, and a single one may fall to a knight, but a group could overcome many.However there could be a interesting study, since knights on horse could only be able to attack the flanks of the phalanx they would do limited damage. however dismounted knights armed with a Poleax would give Spartans a serious run for their money, the biggest threat to th knight is the spartan's shield but since it is bronze i doubt that it'll hold to the pounding of a Knights weapon and once that is taken away the spartan is left with just a spear a weapon Knights see as a serfs weapon and they know how to defeat a spear.
Did zeppelins have armour?
No, armour would have been too heavy for them to lift.
'If you drank out of a can and then a guy drank out of the same can on purpose did he indirect kiss you purpose on?
he just wanted something to drink -_- if he wanted to kiss you, he would have.
