0
Western Empire.
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What did the praetorian guard have to do with the fall of the roman empire?
The Praetorian Guard had nothing at all to do with the fall of the Roman empire. It had been disbanded by the emperor Diocletian roughly 200 years before the fall of the western part of the empire.The Praetorian Guard had nothing at all to do with the fall of the Roman empire. It had been disbanded by the emperor Diocletian roughly 200 years before the fall of the western part of the empire.The Praetorian Guard had nothing at all to do with the fall of the Roman empire. It had been disbanded by the emperor Diocletian roughly 200 years before the fall of the western part of the empire.The Praetorian Guard had nothing at all to do with the fall of the Roman empire. It had been disbanded by the emperor Diocletian roughly 200 years before the fall of the western part of the empire.The Praetorian Guard had nothing at all to do with the fall of the Roman empire. It had been disbanded by the emperor Diocletian roughly 200 years before the fall of the western part of the empire.The Praetorian Guard had nothing at all to do with the fall of the Roman empire. It had been disbanded by the emperor Diocletian roughly 200 years before the fall of the western part of the empire.The Praetorian Guard had nothing at all to do with the fall of the Roman empire. It had been disbanded by the emperor Diocletian roughly 200 years before the fall of the western part of the empire.The Praetorian Guard had nothing at all to do with the fall of the Roman empire. It had been disbanded by the emperor Diocletian roughly 200 years before the fall of the western part of the empire.The Praetorian Guard had nothing at all to do with the fall of the Roman empire. It had been disbanded by the emperor Diocletian roughly 200 years before the fall of the western part of the empire.
Who was Maximian?
Maximian was a Roman military commander who served, together with Diocletian, under the emperors Aurelian (270-275) and Probus (276-282) and took part in the election of Diocletian as emperor. Diocletian appointed him as co-emperor. Diocletian was in charge of the part of the empire and Maximian was in charge of the western part.
What king ruled over the powerful Eastern Empire and chose to move its capital to Byzantium?
Byzantium was redeveloped, turned into the capital of the eastern part of the Roman Empire and renamed Constantinople in 330 by Constantine the Great. He was not a king, he was an emperor. He was not the emperor of the eastern part of the Roman Empire either. To start with he was a co-emperor. There were several co-emperors who ruled parts of the Roman Empire. He was in charge of Britannia, Gaul and Spain in the western part of the Roman Empire. Later he became the sole emperor of the whole of the Roman Empire. Not long before the above, Emperor Diocletian designated Nicomedia (in northwestern Turkey) as the imperial capital of the eastern part of the Roman Empire and Milan as the imperial capital of the western part of the Roman Empire. He co-ruled with co-emperor Maximian. He took charge of the eastern part of the empire and Maximian took charge of the western part. It has to be stressed that Diocletian did not split the empire, which remained a single and united empire. It was an administrative arrangement designed to improve the defences of the vast frontiers of the Roman Empire. Eastern Roman Empire and Western Roman Empire are terms which have been coined by historians. The Romans had only one term: Roman Empire. Constantine the Great moved the capital of the eastern part of the Roman Empire from Nicomedia to the nearby Byzantium.
What divisions of the empire were made by the Diocletian?
.Diocletian created main four administrative divisions called praetorian prefectures. Two of them were in the western part of the empire; Galliae (Gaul, Britannia and Hispania) and Italia et Africa. Two were in the eastern part of the empire; Illyricum (most of south-eastern Europe) and Oriens (southern Romania, Bulgaria, the Roman territories in western Asia and Egypt). Below these the empire was further subdivided into 16 dioceses and about 120 provinces. Diocletian more than doubled the number of Roman provinces by subdividing them). The praetorian prefectures and the dioceses were his creations.
Ruler who divided the roman empire in half?
Emperor Diocletian in CE 285. However, the empire was reunified for short periods of time, like the reign of Emperors Constantine, Julian the Apostate, and Theodosius I. Also, the Eastern Empire had re-invaded the Western Empire during the reign of Justinian I and tried to recreate and rebuild the empire, but with his death the Western part of the Byzantine Empire was retaken by Barbarians.
How did Diocletian Constantine and Clovis contribute to the fall of the Roman Empire?
Diocletian and Constantine did not contribute the the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire. They were around 180-150 years before this. If anything, they postponed it because the former put an end to the military anarchy of the Crisis of the Third century and restored central authority and the latte further consolidated it. Clovis did not contribute to the fall of this part of the empire because when he conquered the rump state of the Romans in central France (the Kingdom of Soissons), this part of the empire was already dead letter.
What was the date of fall of the eastren empire?
The eastern part of the Roman empire fell in 1453.The eastern part of the Roman empire fell in 1453.The eastern part of the Roman empire fell in 1453.The eastern part of the Roman empire fell in 1453.The eastern part of the Roman empire fell in 1453.The eastern part of the Roman empire fell in 1453.The eastern part of the Roman empire fell in 1453.The eastern part of the Roman empire fell in 1453.The eastern part of the Roman empire fell in 1453.
What was the eastern roman empire non as?
The eastern part of the Roman empire was known as the Byzantine empire.The eastern part of the Roman empire was known as the Byzantine empire.The eastern part of the Roman empire was known as the Byzantine empire.The eastern part of the Roman empire was known as the Byzantine empire.The eastern part of the Roman empire was known as the Byzantine empire.The eastern part of the Roman empire was known as the Byzantine empire.The eastern part of the Roman empire was known as the Byzantine empire.The eastern part of the Roman empire was known as the Byzantine empire.The eastern part of the Roman empire was known as the Byzantine empire.
Why was the roman empire divided into two called?
The Romans Empire was never divided. In 286 the emperor Diocletian created a co-emperorship and designated Milan (in Italy) as the imperial capital of the western part of the Roman Empire and Nicomedia (in northwestern Turkey) as the imperial capital of the eastern part of the Roman Empire. Rome became the nominal capital of the whole empire. West and east were administrative sub-subdivisions of a single empire which, Diocletian stressed, was indivisible. Other subdivisions were some two hundred provinces which Diocletian grouped into 12 dioceses. Co-emperorship was not new. Previous emperors had ruled with their sons as co-emperors, with one of them in charge of the western part and one in charge of the eastern part. After Diocletian there were alternations of periods of sole emperorships and co-emperorships, which further demonstrates that the empire was bot divided. The terms Western Roman Empire and Eastern Roman Empire have been coined by historians. The Romans had only one term: Roman Empire. Byzantine Empire is also a term coined by historians. They use it to indicate the eastern part of the Roman Empire after the fall of the western part. The western part of the Roman empire fell under the weight of invasions by Germanic peoples. The eastern part was not affected by these invasions and continued to exist for another 1,000 years. The Romans did not use this term, they called it Roman Empire or Romania (this referred to this empire and not the country which was later called Romania). The term Byzantine is derived from Byzantium, the Greek city which was redeveloped, turned into the imperial capital of the eastern part of the Roman Empire and renamed Constantinople (city of Constantine) by emperor Constantine the Great in 330. It is used to indicate the fact that not long after the fall of the western part, this empire became centred on Greece and Greek in character after it lost most of its non-Greek territories. Greek replaced Latin as the official language of this empire in 620, some 150 years after the fall of the west.
When did Constantine reunite the roman empire?
Constantine did not reunite the Roman Empire. The Roman empire was never split. Emperor Diocletian had created the tetrarchy (role by four) in 286. This was a system of co-emperorship with four co-emperors. Two of them were senior emperors (Augusti) in charge of the eastern part of the empire (Diocletian) and the western part of the empire (Maximian). The other two were junior emperors subordinated to the senior ones and in charge of the defence of the troubled frontier areas of the river Rhine in the west and the river Danube in the east. These were administrative and defence reform of a a single empire. The terms Western Roman Empire and Eastern Roman Empire have been coined by historians. The Romans had only one term Roman Empire. Diocletian stressed that the Roman Empire was indivisible. Constantine started as a co-emperor and became sole emperor in 324 after wining two civil wars, one against a usurper (Maxentius) an one against co-emperor Licinius.
How did the moving capital from Rome to Constantinople weaken the western part of the empire?
The capital of the Roman Empire was not moved from Rome to Constantinople. Rome had already ceased to be the imperial capital under Constantine's predecessor, Diocletian. He designated Nicodemia (in north-western Turkey) as the imperial capital of the eastern part of the Roman Empire and Milan (in northern Italy) as the imperial capital of the western part. Constantinople was just 60 miles to the west of Nicodemia. Constantine's designation of Constantinople as his imperial capital did not weaken the western part of the empire. Diocletian had created a co-emperorship with his fellow general Maximian. Diocletian was in charge of the eastern part of the empire and resided in Nicomedia. Maximian was in charge of the western part and resided in Milan. After winning tow civil wars, Constantine became sole emperor. Therefore, one imperial capital was sufficient and no parts of the empire were weakened.
How did moving the capital from Rome to constantinople weaken the western part of empire?
The capital of the Roman Empire was not moved from Rome to Constantinople. Rome had already ceased to be the imperial capital under Constantine's predecessor, Diocletian. He designated Nicodemia (in north-western Turkey) as the imperial capital of the eastern part of the Roman Empire and Milan (in northern Italy) as the imperial capital of the western part. Constantinople was just 60 miles to the west of Nicodemia. Constantine's designation of Constantinople as his imperial capital did not weaken the western part of the empire. Diocletian had created a co-emperorship with his fellow general Maximian. Diocletian was in charge of the eastern part of the empire and resided in Nicomedia. Maximian was in charge of the western part and resided in Milan. After winning tow civil wars, Constantine became sole emperor. Therefore, one imperial capital was sufficient and no parts of the empire were weakened.
