ughh. are you really asking that qustionn?? Well anyway here is your answer ALOT OF PEOPLe dummie
Primetime What Would You Do - 2009 Rude Cellphone Usage was released on: USA: 10 December 2013
By virtue of operating in certain countries, they have effectively banned cellphone usage in those countries, since such usage is illegal in several. To list all of them would be very difficult and possibly neverending.
Motorbike crashes are very common especially on highways in the greater Toronto area. A lot of things can be factors in these crashes - the number one reason for these crashes is alcohol usage and speeding.
Twitter on your cellphone is very much the same as Twitter on your PC. Some functions of the site may differ, but there shouldn't be too much difference.
Yes, "crash" is countable when referring to specific incidents or occurrences, such as car crashes or airplane crashes. You can say "three crashes" or "a series of crashes." In a different context, "crash" can also refer to a sudden failure, but this usage is less common in a countable sense.
people who are driving can get more distracted from the person talking to them.
Yes, research indicates that in motor vehicle crashes involving cellular phone use, the majority of drivers who were using their phones at the time of the accident were in the striking vehicle rather than the one being struck. This trend highlights the increased risk posed by distracted driving due to phone usage. It underscores the importance of promoting safe driving practices to mitigate such accidents.
About 90 to 98 percent.
over usage of cell phone may leads to cancer.. addiction on texting can cause for stealing an allowance for the prepaid
In-running nip points
Most people tend to use two words (Cell Phone), although I expect it varies from region to region and person to person.
Several states and localities have passed laws against driving and cellphone usage, either talking or texting, but such legislation is being bitterly fought by the cellphone industry which wants no limit to the usage of their technology as it is TREMENDOUSLY profitable to them. Their difficulty in doing this is that they can't be seen as TOO blatantly anti-safety while at the same time pushing for non-restrictive usage - a delicate balancing act. [an opinion is expressed on the discussion page]