The question is extremely vague and unanswerable as it does not mention the issue that conservative Judean Jews would have to take a position on. Please resubmit the question clarifying this.
There is no record of such an attitude.
They were both Jews, so they would be Judean.
Shlomo Simonsohn has written: 'Apostolic See and the Jews' 'The Jews in Sicily, Vol. 8' 'The Jews in Sicily , 383-1300 (Studies in the History of Religions)'
It was Joseph, a wealthy man from the Judean city of Arimathea and a reputable member of the Jewish Sanhedrin. And because of his fear of unbelieving Jews, Joseph did not openly identify himself as a disciple of Jesus Christ. (Luke 23:50,51; John 19:38)
Typically, there is no difference. "Yehudi" is just the Hebrew and Arabic word for "Jew". However, Yehudi can sometimes also be translated as Judean, referring to people of the ancient Kingdom of Judah who are the forerunners of today's Jews.
Its purpose was to help the Jews from leaving Germany
Because the Nazis decided the Jews had no rights and were to be exterminated
because they like it
The final solution was what was reffered to as the way to exterminate the Jews. This was debated in The Wansee conference.
The 16th Annual Humanitarian Awards Dinner of National Conference of Christians and Jews - 1979 TV was released on: USA: 17 September 1979 (Los Angeles, California)
It led to the Nazi undertaking to kill all the European Jews.
No, the Nazi persecution had started in 1933 and intensified rapidly from 1935 on.