Protect citizens from being tired under unconstitutional laws
Apex
no the power of judicial review is not mentioned in the constitution. because Judicial Review was used in 13th century law but the courts didn't agree with it so it was forgotten. until the case of Marbury v. Madison that is when Judicial Review came back to the power of the Supreme Court.
The power to declare a law unconstitutional (Judicial Review).
The power of Judicial Review is the major check that the judicial branch has over the other two (legislative and executive) branches of the U.S. government. Judicial review allows the federal courts to rule actions of the President and Congress unconstitutional, and thus overturn them.
Judicial Review is an important part of checks and balances it keeps unconstitutional laws from being passed that would give parts of the government too much power or violate the constitutional rights of the people.
Protect citizens from being tired under unconstitutional laws Apex
B. protect citizens from being tried under unconstitutional laws -APEX
The Constitution gives Congress the judicial powers to create all of the federal courts below the Supreme Court and to structure the federal judiciary. Congress also has the power to define federal crimes and set punishment for violators of federal law.
The Judicial Branch was established by Article III, and gave the branch the authority to decide cases and controversies. Strangely enough, the greatest power that is exercised by the courts, judicial review, the power to declare laws unconstitutional, is not explicitly granted by the Constitution.
my aunt is my judicial guardian. She has guardenship of me through the courts. She is not my mom the only thing she has right to is to make sure that i am safe and fed. My mom didn't give permission the judge did... my aunt is my judicial guardian. She has guardenship of me through the courts. She is not my mom the only thing she has right to is to make sure that i am safe and fed. My mom didn't give permission the judge did...
Judicial review allows a court to evaluate laws, policies and presidential executive orders that are relevant to a case being heard by that court and determine if they are constitutional. The courts may nullify (overturn) any of these and render them unenforceable if they're found to be repugnant to the Constitution. It is important to note that any act of the President or Congress found unconstitutional in a lower court will almost certainly be appealed to the US Supreme Court for a final decision.
overturn an act of congress that violates the constitution - apex
Everyone has the right to study precedents, including you. All that means is reading the written opinions (decisions) of cases that are considered guidelines for use in deciding similar cases. And yes, the justices study precedents (or make their law clerks do it). Judicial review is an implied constitutional power that allows courts to evaluate a questioned law in a case they're hearing and determine if the law is constitutional. If the justices decide the law is unconstitutional, then it's nullified and becomes unenforceable.